[openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

If this is still an issue with the current release(s), please open a new ticket. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Auto

Re: [openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

john via RT wrote: Why is it that the static locks have not been removed completely for 0.9.8? If it is to keep some backward compatibility with older apps, or ones that see no reason to change, would it not be preferable if the whole of openssl was compatible in this way, including the en

Re: [openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

Hi Richard, Thanks for taking a look at this. > [guest - Thu Oct  6 11:55:10 2005]: > > >   This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it > > registers a lock debugging callback) and Apache 2.x (and other apps > > too no doubt) > > That's because those applications don't

Re: [openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 03 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100 (CET), Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: richard> [Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket richard> database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte] I did it wrong.

[openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte] [And I did it wrong the first time. Appologies for the dupliactes] Hi Richard, Thanks for taking a look at this. > [guest - Thu Oct  6 11:55:10 2005]: > > >  

[openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

[Originally sent by John, all I'm doing is forwarding it to our ticket database to make sure it gets included. -- Richard Levitte] Hi Richard, Thanks for taking a look at this. > [guest - Thu Oct  6 11:55:10 2005]: > > >   This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it >

[openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

[guest - Thu Oct 6 11:55:10 2005]: > I notice that the chil engine in 0.9.8 has had the hack which allows > it to work with static locks removed. That is correct. The reason is exactly what you said; it's a hack, and it was *meant* to be temporary, to allow for a smooth move from the 0.9. 6

[openssl.org #1212] chil engine no longer works with static locks in 0.9.8

Hi, I notice that the chil engine in 0.9.8 has had the hack which allows it to work with static locks removed. This stops our engine working with the openssl application (as it registers a lock debugging callback) and Apache 2.x (and other apps too no doubt) I appologise for not spott