Re: [openssl.org #2035] openssl speed camellia-192-cbc segfaults

2009-09-17 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
Could you complement back-trace with 'info reg' output? (gdb) bt #0 _x86_64_Camellia_encrypt () at cmll-x86_64.s:74 #1 0x77a7a4b4 in Camellia_cbc_encrypt () at cmll-x86_64.s:1686 #2 0x7fffca30 in ?? () #3 0x0068e190 in ?? () #4 0x in ?? ()

Re: [openssl.org #2035] openssl speed camellia-192-cbc segfaults

2009-09-15 Thread Tomas Mraz via RT
On Sat, 2009-09-12 at 17:32 +0200, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote: Could you complement back-trace with 'info reg' output? (gdb) bt #0 _x86_64_Camellia_encrypt () at cmll-x86_64.s:74 #1 0x77a7a4b4 in Camellia_cbc_encrypt () at cmll-x86_64.s:1686 #2 0x7fffca30 in ?? () #3

[openssl.org #2035] openssl speed camellia-192-cbc segfaults

2009-09-04 Thread Tomas Mraz via RT
This was reported in Fedora bugzilla by Pekka Pietikainen : The other variants seem fine, but (gdb) set args speed camellia-192-cbc (gdb) run Starting program: /usr/bin/openssl speed camellia-192-cbc [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] Doing camellia-192 cbc for 3s on 16 size blocks: