On Apr 26, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
>> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]:
>>
>>
>> You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control
>> variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was
>> changed to unsigned
> [seggelm...@fh-muenster.de - Mon Apr 26 11:04:29 2010]:
>
>
> You're right. The loop was written in the assumption that the control
>variable in the for loop can become -1. Since the variable type was
>changed to unsigned long, that didn't work anymore and my fix also
>didn't correc
On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:20 PM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote:
> This patch appears to be broken on OpenSSL 0.9.8 it gives warnings:
>
> d1_both.c: In function ‘dtls1_reassemble_fragment’:
> d1_both.c:623: error: passing argument 2 of ‘pqueue_find’ makes integer
> from pointer without a cast
> ../incl
This patch appears to be broken on OpenSSL 0.9.8 it gives warnings:
d1_both.c: In function ‘dtls1_reassemble_fragment’:
d1_both.c:623: error: passing argument 2 of ‘pqueue_find’ makes integer
from pointer without a cast
../include/openssl/pqueue.h:89: note: expected ‘long unsigned int’ but
argumen
The reassembly for fragmented DTLS handshake messages only works if the
fragments don't overlap, aren't reordered and haven't been retransmitted. This
patch fixes this and allows the reassembly of messages regardless of
retransmissions, losses, reordering or even the mixture of fragments of
dif
