[openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2014-06-29 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
Reported bug fixed. No further responses assuming resolved. Steve. -- Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project

[openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2012-03-05 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
> [nick.le...@usa.g4s.com - Mon Sep 12 10:31:50 2011]: > > Thank you for looking at the patch and reporting the problem >with it. I apologise that I did not test it properly. The path loop >test in the patch should of course be first whether the issuer is >in the chain and only if it i

RE: [openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-27 Thread Nick Lewis via RT
>With update version i confirm that regression test of a software now >pass with OpenSSL HEAD version. > >I still have problem with HEAD regarding check if is for self signed. >This case is not in openssl regression tests ans cannot be reproduced >with openssl command line. Case is when callba

Re: [openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-26 Thread Roumen Petrov via RT
Nick Lewis via RT wrote: > Roumen > > Thank you for looking at the patch [SNIP] > + if (issuer_num&& (issuer_num< x_num)) > > Please find a corrected version below > > Best Regards > Nick > [SNIP] With update version i confirm that regression test of a software now pass with Op

Re: [openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-26 Thread Roumen Petrov
Nick Lewis via RT wrote: Roumen Thank you for looking at the patch [SNIP] + if (issuer_num&& (issuer_num< x_num)) Please find a corrected version below Best Regards Nick [SNIP] With update version i confirm that regression test of a software now pass with OpenSSL HEAD v

RE: [openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-12 Thread Nick Lewis via RT
Roumen Thank you for looking at the patch and reporting the problem with it. I apologise that I did not test it properly. The path loop test in the patch should of course be first whether the issuer is in the chain and only if it is then whether it is lower than the cert x i.e. +

Re: [openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-11 Thread Roumen Petrov via RT
Nick Lewis via RT wrote: > The path loop detection in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c:check_issued() does not > work correctly for some combinations of ctx->chain, x and issuer. For example > when the cert x is in the chain at a location other than the top, a path loop > is incorrectly declared. Also if

Re: [openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-11 Thread Roumen Petrov
Nick Lewis via RT wrote: The path loop detection in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c:check_issued() does not work correctly for some combinations of ctx->chain, x and issuer. For example when the cert x is in the chain at a location other than the top, a path loop is incorrectly declared. Also if the ce

[openssl.org #2594] Problem with X509 path loop detection - PATCH

2011-09-09 Thread Nick Lewis via RT
The path loop detection in crypto/x509/x509_vfy.c:check_issued() does not work correctly for some combinations of ctx->chain, x and issuer. For example when the cert x is in the chain at a location other than the top, a path loop is incorrectly declared. Also if the cert x is at the top of the c