[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #3322] [PATCH] ccgost to use configured params for 28147-89 in CNT and IMIT mode

2016-02-02 Thread Rich Salz via RT
GOST is now a separately-maintained engine. -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org ___ openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev

Re: [openssl.org #3322] [PATCH] ccgost to use configured params for 28147-89 in CNT and IMIT mode

2014-04-22 Thread Dmitry Belyavsky
Hello Andrey, Thank you for your work, but I do not see the patch :-( I should say that in practice the CNT mode is used in TLS where usage of the Gost28147_CryptoProParamSetA is required. On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 7:40 PM, Andrey Kulikov via RT r...@openssl.orgwrote: Currently ccgost engine

Re: [openssl.org #3322] [PATCH] ccgost to use configured params for 28147-89 in CNT and IMIT mode

2014-04-22 Thread Andrey Kulikov via RT
Dmitriy, Thanks for noticing! I do not see it either - correcting myself. :-) You are right - according to http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chudov-cryptopro-cptls-04 CryptoProParamSetA is required in GOST TLS. But only for content encryption. Premaster secret encryption could use any other

[openssl.org #3322] [PATCH] ccgost to use configured params for 28147-89 in CNT and IMIT mode

2014-04-21 Thread Andrey Kulikov via RT
Currently ccgost engine use configured params (s-boxes) when it works in CFB mode only. For CNT and IMITO parameters are hardcoded to Gost28147_CryptoProParamSetA Supplied patch allow ccgost engine to really use parameters, specified either in config file, or via engine API. When nothing is