Re: [openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-02-11 Thread Ala Wai via RT
THis maybe a dumb question, but where do I go to get the latest version of the source code (0.9.8)? Thanks in advance, Ala --- Stephen Henson via RT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > IPv6 code now checked into 0.9.8. Let me know of any > problems. > > Steve. >

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-02-04 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[steve - Fri Jan 31 20:40:28 2003]: > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 07:56:07 2003]: > > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 31 Jan > > 2003 04:59:36 +0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > rt> > > rt> Do you have any ideia when? > > > > 0.9.8 at the earliest. > > 0.9.8 a

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-31 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Fri Jan 31 07:56:07 2003]: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 31 Jan > 2003 04:59:36 +0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > rt> > rt> Do you have any ideia when? > > 0.9.8 at the earliest. 0.9.8 at the latest :-) I'm currently testing some code that ha

Re: [openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker via RT
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 04:59:36 +0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> rt> [steve - Thu Jan 30 20:44:34 2003]: rt> rt> > However no version of OpenSSL will currently display that correctly. rt> > rt> > This isn't very friendly and proper IPv6 support

Re: [openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Fri, 31 Jan 2003 04:59:36 +0100 (MET), " via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: rt> rt> [steve - Thu Jan 30 20:44:34 2003]: rt> rt> > However no version of OpenSSL will currently display that correctly. rt> > rt> > This isn't very friendly and proper IPv6 support w

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-30 Thread via RT
[steve - Thu Jan 30 20:44:34 2003]: > However no version of OpenSSL will currently display that correctly. > > This isn't very friendly and proper IPv6 support will be added at some > stage. Do you have any ideia when? __ Open

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-30 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[steve - Thu Jan 30 20:44:34 2003]: > [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 30 20:06:27 2003]: > > > > > > > What do you mean the DER option in 0.9.7? Do I modify > > the IP address to DER and put it in the config file? > > > > subjectAltName=IP:DER: > > > > Is there some examples of doing this? > > >

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-30 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jan 30 20:06:27 2003]: > > > The best you can do at present is to either use the > > DER option in 0.9.7 > > if you know the encoding or the new mini-ASN1 > > compiler of 0.9.8. Neither > > of which is particularly easy to do. > > What do you mean the DER option in 0.9.

Re: [openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-30 Thread Ala Wai via RT
> The best you can do at present is to either use the > DER option in 0.9.7 > if you know the encoding or the new mini-ASN1 > compiler of 0.9.8. Neither > of which is particularly easy to do. What do you mean the DER option in 0.9.7? Do I modify the IP address to DER and put it in the config fi

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-29 Thread Stephen Henson via RT
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Wed Jan 29 09:15:30 2003]: > Hi Richard, > > Sorry about asking this of you directly, but I can't > seem to get a post onto the openssl mailing list. > > I was hoping you could answer my question, or perhaps > post it to the list for me... > > This isn't Richard its the

[openssl.org #484] openssl question

2003-01-29 Thread Ala Wai via RT
Hi Richard, Sorry about asking this of you directly, but I can't seem to get a post onto the openssl mailing list. I was hoping you could answer my question, or perhaps post it to the list for me... I guess the first question is : Is ipv6 supported? I've create certificates with IPv4