Bodo Moeller wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:02:45PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>>Avery Pennarun via RT wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
>>
>
Good question, but this problem does not appear to apply to C, and
anyway it only makes *existing* c
On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 07:02:45PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Avery Pennarun via RT wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
>>> Good question, but this problem does not appear to apply to C, and
>>> anyway it only makes *existing* code uglier -- for new code, the
>
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:14:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> > Using "const unsigned char **", however, is not 100% api-compatible, because
> > you can't safely pass an "unsigned char **" to it, for complicated reasons
> > explained in the URL I sent earlier.
>
> [http://www.geocrawler.com/a
Avery Pennarun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
>>> It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
>>> d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 12:14:00PM +0200, Bodo Moeller wrote:
> > Using "const unsigned char **", however, is not 100% api-compatible, because
> > you can't safely pass an "unsigned char **" to it, for complicated reasons
> > explained in the URL I sent earlier.
>
> [http://www.geocrawler.com/ar
Avery Pennarun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
>> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
>>> It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
>>> d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like t
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
> > It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
> > d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like this:
> >
> > d2i_RSAPrivateKey(RS
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 01:26:42PM +0200, Bodo Moeller via RT wrote:
> [[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
> > It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
> > d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like this:
> >
> > d2i_RSAPrivateKey(RSA
[[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Thu Jun 6 18:39:34 2002]:
[...]
> It appears the openssl guys goofed in 0.97beta. The prototype for the
> d2i_RSAPrivateKey function in 0.9.6c, which I use, is like this:
>
> d2i_RSAPrivateKey(RSA **a, unsigned char **pp, long length);
>
> ie., without a cons
