[openssl.org #670] -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2014-06-27 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Never heard back about the .S file mentioned in the report, so resolving this. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automa

[openssl.org #670] -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2014-06-27 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Never heard back about the .S file mentioned in the report, so resolving this. __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automa

Re: [openssl.org #670] -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-09-29 Thread Peter Sylvester
> > Uhmm, which OpenSSL version are you talking about? I can't find > des_enc-sparc.S anywhere in my copy of the 0.9.7 branch... > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 29 17:06:13 2003]: > It is in the latest branch in crypto/des/asm (at least after make). It seems that my problem went away with an i

[openssl.org #670] -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-09-27 Thread Richard Levitte via RT
Uhmm, which OpenSSL version are you talking about? I can't find des_enc-sparc.S anywhere in my copy of the 0.9.7 branch... [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Tue Jul 29 17:06:13 2003]: > > it seems that in the current snapshots the shared > option for solaris does not work correctly. > > Compilation in cryp

Re: -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-08-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:40:29 +0200 (MEST), Peter Sylvester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Peter.Sylvester> > > evp/c_all_c.c does not compile, the program Peter.Sylvester> > > seems useless anyway, it just includes engine.h Peter.Sylvester> > > unconditionally. I just

Re: -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-08-04 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 4 Aug 2003 11:40:29 +0200 (MEST), Peter Sylvester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Peter.Sylvester> > > Why does engines insist to compile the engines Peter.Sylvester> > > with no-engine. Peter.Sylvester> > Peter.Sylvester> > We generally do this because we don't

Re: -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-08-04 Thread Peter Sylvester
hi Ben, > > > > Why does engines insist to compile the engines with no-engine. > > We generally do this because we don't have a mechanism for conditionals > in Makefiles. > hm, pushing a model makefile through a C preprocessor? > > evp/c_all_c.c does not compile, the program > > seems us

Re: -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-08-03 Thread Ben Laurie
Peter Sylvester wrote: > Well, sorry for the message below. The > result is the destest crashes. > > So, on solaris, trying the "no-asm shared", somehow now > I get problems conpiling engines, ok trying no-engine > since I don't have any. > > Why does engines insist to compile the engines wit

Re: -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-07-29 Thread Peter Sylvester
Well, sorry for the message below. The result is the destest crashes. So, on solaris, trying the "no-asm shared", somehow now I get problems conpiling engines, ok trying no-engine since I don't have any. Why does engines insist to compile the engines with no-engine. evp/c_all_c.c does not c

[openssl.org #670] -fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-07-29 Thread Peter Sylvester via RT
it seems that in the current snapshots the shared option for solaris does not work correctly. Compilation in crypto/des of gcc -c -o asm/des_enc-sparc.o asm/des_enc-sparc.S should probably be gcc -fPIC -c -o asm/des_enc-sparc.o asm/des_enc-sparc.S in order not to provoke a linker er

-fPIC flag missing for asm/des_enc-sparc.

2003-07-29 Thread Peter Sylvester
it seems that in the current snapshots the shared option for solaris does not work correctly. Compilation in crypto/des of gcc -c -o asm/des_enc-sparc.o asm/des_enc-sparc.S should probably be gcc -fPIC -c -o asm/des_enc-sparc.o asm/des_enc-sparc.S in order not to provoke a linker err