Re: [openssl.org #1549] [BUG] Segfault in BN_mont test on linux-x86_64 SNAP 20070621

2007-06-21 Thread Andy Polyakov via RT
> OpenSSL Version: 0.9.9-dev SNAP 20070621 > OS. Linux/x86_64/Fedora 7 > > 1. make report testlog attached > 2. Getting segfault when running make tests during big number library test. > > test BN_mont > *** glibc detected *** ./bntest: free(): invalid next size (fast): http://cvs.openssl.or

[openssl.org #1549] [BUG] Segfault in BN_mont test on linux-x86_64 SNAP 20070621

2007-06-21 Thread Richard Chan via RT
OpenSSL Version: 0.9.9-dev SNAP 20070621 OS. Linux/x86_64/Fedora 7 1. make report testlog attached 2. Getting segfault when running make tests during big number library test. test BN_mont *** glibc detected *** ./bntest: free(): invalid next size (fast): 0x006ce600 *** === Backtr

BN_mont test

2000-02-14 Thread Andy Polyakov
Is it just me or does test_mont ever complete? I mean bits assignment doesn't make any sense to me: BN_rand(&a,100,0,0); /**/ BN_rand(&b,100,0,0); /**/ for (i=0; ihttp://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager