In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:49:29 + (GMT), Dave Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dave.roberts> OK, where or to whom do I send the diff output?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote:
> dave.roberts> The "issues" are how to cope with it within the
> dave.roberts> set_padding function.
>
> Hmm, extend the flags just a little bit maybe, so we'd end up adding
> the following lines:
I've made local changes to that function
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 3 Dec 2003 16:43:29 + (GMT), Dave Roberts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
dave.roberts> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
dave.roberts>
dave.roberts> > Are you suggesting that OpenSSL should include support
dave.roberts> > for other padding scheme
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dr. Stephen Henson wrote:
> Are you suggesting that OpenSSL should include support for other padding
> schemes or that it should be possible to disable PKCS#5 padding so an
> application can handle its own padding?
The former would be my preference. I already know that I coul
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003, Dave Roberts wrote:
> Hi
>
> Within evp/evp_enc.c, function EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() it looks at the last
> byte of any padding, then works backwards ensuring that all padding
> characters are the same. This is, I believe, conformant to PKCS#5.
>
> However, this doesn't allow
Hi
Within evp/evp_enc.c, function EVP_DecryptFinal_ex() it looks at the last
byte of any padding, then works backwards ensuring that all padding
characters are the same. This is, I believe, conformant to PKCS#5.
However, this doesn't allow for other padding schemes such as that
specified in FIPS
