Re: Guillou-Quisquater signatures

2003-03-09 Thread Ben Laurie
Eric Cronin wrote: a) How much more efficient is it? I don't know the answer to this one... Lacking any implementations to actually benchmark, all I have are some big-O space and time complexities as compared to RSA/DSA/ECDSA. This is why I was wondering if anyone had experience with it in

Re: Guillou-Quisquater signatures

2003-03-08 Thread Ben Laurie
Eric Cronin wrote: The Guillou-Quisquater (GQ) signature scheme seems to be popular in theory literature due to its efficiency compared to other signature algorithms. In the real world however, there does not seem to be much use of GQ... It's not is any of the common cryptographic libraries