Hi,
> I've just tried compiling OpenSSL-0.9.8a for HPPA64 architecture
> (using gcc-4.1) and 'make test' ends with
>
> > ...
> > ecb idea ok
> > cbc idea ok
> > cfb64 idea ok
> > ../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./shatest
> > *** Termination signal 139
> >
> > Stop.
> > *** Error exit co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've just tried compiling OpenSSL-0.9.8a for HPPA64 architecture
(using gcc-4.1) and 'make test' ends with
...
ecb idea ok
cbc idea ok
cfb64 idea ok
../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./shatest
*** Termination signal 139
Stop.
*** Error exit code 1
Stop.
Hi,
> >
> >>I've just tried compiling OpenSSL-0.9.8a for HPPA64 architecture
> >>(using gcc-4.1) and 'make test' ends with
> >>
> >>
> >>>...
> >>>ecb idea ok
> >>>cbc idea ok
> >>>cfb64 idea ok
> >>>../util/shlib_wrap.sh ./shatest
> >>>*** Termination signal 139
> >>>
> >>>Stop
Has using a different compiler been suggested already?
Any suggestions for the newest gcc that's known to work? 3.4.5?
I'm using one of HP's "Testdrive" machines for building, so I suppose
building several compilers wouldn't be appreciated too much, especially
since the 4.1.0 that's causing
Hi,
> Since you are on an HP testdrive system, why not try the HP compilers?
Yes, right. In the end I try to port some C++ code that's only ever been
compiled with gcc, so I don't really want to either fix the "bugs" that
gcc tolerates nor add workarounds for the correct code that HP's co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Since you are on an HP testdrive system, why not try the HP compilers?
Yes, right. In the end I try to port some C++ code that's only ever been
compiled with gcc, so I don't really want to either fix the "bugs" that
gcc tolerates nor add workarounds f
Hi,
> > so I didn't really think of using HP's compiler.
Well, using HP's compiler, I get an OpenSSL version which does
successfully pass the "make test" command...
Looks more and more like a bug in gcc-4.1
> Portable code is a chore ain't it :) It could be worse, you could be
> trying t
