On Sep 16, 2011, at 12:51 PM, Paul Witty wrote:
> On 15/09/11 18:12, Michael Tuexen wrote:
>> Hi Paul,
>>
>> I think this is what Robin found. Could you give the patch provided by Robin
>> in
>> http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2602
>> a try? It should fix your issue.
> It does indee
On 15/09/11 18:12, Michael Tuexen wrote:
Hi Paul,
I think this is what Robin found. Could you give the patch provided by Robin in
http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=2602
a try? It should fix your issue.
It does indeed; the code to reproduce is for informational purposes
only, as you d
On Sep 15, 2011, at 6:57 PM, Paul Witty wrote:
> The code which reproduces the crash (not necessarily minimal):
>
> SSL_CTX * dtls_context = SSL_CTX_new(DTLSv1_method());
> SSL_CTX_set_read_ahead(dtls_context, 1);
> SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(dtls_context, "DEFAULT:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5");
> SSL_CTX_set_op
The code which reproduces the crash (not necessarily minimal):
SSL_CTX * dtls_context = SSL_CTX_new(DTLSv1_method());
SSL_CTX_set_read_ahead(dtls_context, 1);
SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list(dtls_context, "DEFAULT:!LOW:!EXP:!MD5");
SSL_CTX_set_options(dtls_context, SSL_OP_NO_TICKET);
SSL * client_ssl = S
Hi Paul,
On Sep 9, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Paul Witty wrote:
> Since updating to OpenSSL 1.0.0e from 1.0.0d, I've been suffering a crash
> when connecting with DTLS. I've tracked this down to trying to perform a
> memcpy of (unsigned int)-13 in do_dtls1_write (where a length of -13 is
> passed all
On Sep 9, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Paul Witty wrote:
> Hi,
> Since updating to OpenSSL 1.0.0e from 1.0.0d, I've been suffering a crash
> when connecting with DTLS. I've tracked this down to trying to perform a
> memcpy of (unsigned int)-13 in do_dtls1_write (where a length of -13 is
> passed all the
Hi,
Since updating to OpenSSL 1.0.0e from 1.0.0d, I've been suffering a
crash when connecting with DTLS. I've tracked this down to trying to
perform a memcpy of (unsigned int)-13 in do_dtls1_write (where a length
of -13 is passed all the way down from dtls1_do_Write, which seems to be
because
