On Sep 22, 2014, at 6:19 AM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tom Francis wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Andy Polyako
Hey guys,
My hubby works in the Firmware R&D for the HP Business critical systems
group. I figured this was right up his alley, so I hope that people do not
mind seeking out some further advice here.
Here's the advice I've gotten so far:
---
Wow,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tom Francis wrote:
>
>>
>> On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Andy Polyakov
>> wrote:
>> > > I could not get this working even on a
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 7:28 AM, Tom Francis wrote:
>
> On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Andy Polyakov
> wrote:
> > > I could not get this working even on a 11.23 machine having latest
> (last
> > > one released in December 2007)
On Sep 19, 2014, at 7:55 AM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > I could not get this working even on a 11.23 machine having latest (last
> > one released in December 2007).
>
> ... latest what? I mean it appears that you missed something. B
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > I could not get this working even on a 11.23 machine having latest (last
> > one released in December 2007).
>
> ... latest what? I mean it appears that you missed something. But more
> relevant question is what does ld -V return, what pat
> I could not get this working even on a 11.23 machine having latest (last
> one released in December 2007).
... latest what? I mean it appears that you missed something. But more
relevant question is what does ld -V return, what patches are installed.
But please don't show the list and ask which
I could not get this working even on a 11.23 machine having latest (last
one released in December 2007).
Can anyone tell me the impact of not using +sectionmerge since it is not
working on 11.23.
I am also evaluating the possibility of using 11.31 and tried building
openssl on it, however, getting
On Sep 3, 2014, at 11:41 AM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
>> In the ld man page, I could find help for option +nosectionmerge.
>> +nosectionmerge
>> With the -r option, allow procedures to be
>> positioned independently. The default is to merg
Thanks Andy,
zLinux worked with "no-asm" thanks a ton!
I am working on HP-UX now.
Regards,
Mrunal
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Andy Polyakov wrote:
> > In the ld man page, I could find help for option +nosectionmerge.
> >+nosectionmerge
> > With the -
> In the ld man page, I could find help for option +nosectionmerge.
>+nosectionmerge
> With the -r option, allow procedures to be
> positioned independently. The default is to merge
> all procedures into a si
Thanks Tom,
In the ld man page, I could find help for option +nosectionmerge.
+nosectionmerge
With the -r option, allow procedures to be
positioned independently. The default is to merge
all procedures into a
For HP-UX, be sure to install the latest linker patches. +sectionmerge has
been around for a long while, so you’ve probably got a lot of patches to
install. :)
TOM
On Sep 2, 2014, at 5:45 AM, Mrunal Nerpawar wrote:
> Hi
>
> zLinux:
> 1) ./config
> Configured for linux64-s390x.
> 2) make
Hi
zLinux:
1) ./config
Configured for linux64-s390x.
2) make
Error:
making fips in crypto...
make[1]: Entering directory `/builds/openssl/openssl-fips-ecp-2.0.5/crypto'
gcc -I. -I.. -I../include -DOPENSSL_FIPSCANISTER -fPIC -DOPENSSL_PIC
-DOPENSSL_THREADS -D_REENTRANT -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -
14 matches
Mail list logo
