Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i.e. my suggestion is to replace +O4 with +O3 +Oprocelim or simply +O3
> in next release. And of course I appreciate if you could throw RC4_CHUNK
> at the snapshot and post output from 'apps/openssl speed rc4'... Of
> course provided that +O3 works:-)
Us
> ... the "ucomp runs
> forever with +O4" compiler bug has again reared it's ugly head.
I actually don't think +O4 is an appropriate option for a library. From
what I've heard (I could get it wrong though) +O4 generates some
pseudo-code which in turn is used in some really global optimization
pass
A long time ago Andy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> snapshot and test-run it. I also would like to challenge HP/UX and AIX
> users to add RC4_CHUNK to the option list and tell how did it go.
> Basically I want you to build vanilla OpenSSL, run 'apps/openssl speed
> rc4', add RC4_CHUNK to th
Hi,
>
> ... modified rc4_enc.c ...
Final version is appearing in today's snapshot. You can also view at
http://www.openssl.org/source/cvs/exp/crypto/rc4/rc4_enc.c?rev=1.5 if
desired. The code is enabled by default on all SPARC (Solaris and
Linux), Alpha (Tru64 UNIX, Linux, BSD and UNICOS) and MIP
