On Sunday 15 September 2013 18:30:32 Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote:
> Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> > El 12/09/13 14:17, Yuriy Kaminskiy escribió:
> >> This will break on glibc-3.0.
> >>
> >> #if defined(__GLIBC_PREREQ) && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 16)
> >
> > Yes, that is the correct way, but ensure is being inc
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El 12/09/13 14:17, Yuriy Kaminskiy escribió:
>
>> This will break on glibc-3.0.
>>
>> #if defined(__GLIBC_PREREQ) && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 16)
>
> Yes, that is the correct way, but ensure is being included.
(it seems this patch will be rejected for different reasons anyw
On Friday 13 September 2013 16:27:03 Green, Paul wrote:
> Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> > El 12/09/13 14:17, Yuriy Kaminskiy escribió:
> >> This will break on glibc-3.0.
> >> #if defined(__GLIBC_PREREQ) && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 16)
> >
> >Yes, that is the correct way, but ensure is being included.
>
>
Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El 12/09/13 14:17, Yuriy Kaminskiy escribió:
>
>> This will break on glibc-3.0.
>> #if defined(__GLIBC_PREREQ) && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 16)
>
>Yes, that is the correct way, but ensure is being included.
As a compiler implementer, I must object. The universal convention is
El 12/09/13 14:17, Yuriy Kaminskiy escribió:
> This will break on glibc-3.0.
>
> #if defined(__GLIBC_PREREQ) && __GLIBC_PREREQ(2, 16)
Yes, that is the correct way, but ensure is being included.
__
OpenSSL Project
Kyle McMartin wrote:
> More reliable than playing games with signal handling in libraries.
>
> --- a/crypto/armcap.c
> +++ b/crypto/armcap.c
> @@ -9,11 +9,6 @@
>
> unsigned int OPENSSL_armcap_P;
>
> -static sigset_t all_masked;
> -
> -static sigjmp_buf ill_jmp;
> -static void ill_handler (int
On Wednesday 11 September 2013 10:49:36 Kyle McMartin wrote:
> +#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__>=2
> +void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void) __attribute__((constructor));
> +#endif
> +void OPENSSL_cpuid_setup(void)
this can be made simpler:
#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__>=2
__attribut
