Re: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine(openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2003-01-30 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 30 Jan 2003 13:33:59 -0500, Geoff Thorpe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: geoff> Erm, I think there's a fundemantal problem with this. I understand the geoff> desire to build a version of openssl such that it doesn't include the geoff> engine footprint, nor its exe

Re: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine(openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2003-01-30 Thread Geoff Thorpe
* Richard Levitte via RT ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > OK, I looked at the no-engine patch again, and really saw no harm in it, so it's >committed, and will be part of all release from 0.9.7a and on (as well as the current >0.9.7 and main snapshots). > > This ticket is now resolved. Erm, I th

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread
I think it was about a month ago and would have mentioned "no-hw" and "no-engine" in the messages, in fact there probably aren't too many messages with "no-engine" in them. I don't recall giving any details about what was wrong with no-hw and don't recall the details now. Though I do remember t

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread Steven Reddie
I think it was about a month ago and would have mentioned "no-hw" and "no-engine" in the messages, in fact there probably aren't too many messages with "no-engine" in them. I don't recall giving any details about what was wrong with no-hw and don't recall the details now. Though I do remember th

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread
Richard, I found that the no-hw option didn't work. After discussing it on the list I agreed to contribute a no-engine option. I understand that no-engine doesn't imply the same thing as no-hw, but it still seems like a good option to have. Until the software crypto gets moved into an engine

RE: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-10-04 Thread Steven Reddie
Richard, I found that the no-hw option didn't work. After discussing it on the list I agreed to contribute a no-engine option. I understand that no-engine doesn't imply the same thing as no-hw, but it still seems like a good option to have. Until the software crypto gets moved into an engine t

Re: [openssl.org #287] [PATCH] no-engine (openssl-0.9.7-stable-SNAP-20020915)

2002-09-17 Thread Steven Reddie
The patch that I submitted is incomplete. I thought that it was working because I forgot that the tests need to be invoked manually. Looks like a little more work to do. Steven - Original Message - From: "Steven Reddie via RT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday,