On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 11:06:56AM -0400, Salz, Rich wrote:
> > And I want to reduce the number of exposed APIs.
>
> Except that as we (hopefully) move to making struct's opaque, then we'll need
> add lots of accessors. I assume you know that, but just want to make sure
> folks realize it.
Tho
> And I want to reduce the number of exposed APIs.
Except that as we (hopefully) move to making struct's opaque, then we'll need
add lots of accessors. I assume you know that, but just want to make sure
folks realize it.
In the medium term, I'd like to see things like this "BN foo;" break at c
On Sat, Jun 07, 2014 at 09:46:38AM -0400, Mike Bland wrote:
>
> Why do any of the symbols need to be private? Is that degree of
> encapsulation necessary, and does it really discourage irresponsible
> clients? The source code is open, so people can always build their own
> copy and depend on inter
Before this goes in, I'm going to take this opportunity to raise a
question that I've documented on the wiki (which came up in a
discussion off-list):
http://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Unit_Testing#How_to_Manage_Private_Symbols
Why do any of the symbols need to be private? Is that degree of
encap
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Thu Jun 05 23:42:31 2014, k...@roeckx.be wrote:
> >
> > > We are likely to see
> > > a lot more like this as Mike's test team get going. In unit testing
> > its "okay"
> > > to access internal symbols.
> >
> > But then you sh
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:59:30PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Thu Jun 05 23:42:31 2014, k...@roeckx.be wrote:
> >
> > > We are likely to see
> > > a lot more like this as Mike's test team get going. In unit testing
> > its "okay"
> > > to access internal symbols.
> >
> > But then you sh
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:15PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Thu Jun 05 20:41:05 2014, k...@roeckx.be wrote:
> > This is probably related to me not exporting those symbols as they are
> > marked local.
>
> Kurt
>
> Is this related to the way you build the Debian packages?
Yes. And
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 11:34:15PM +0200, Matt Caswell via RT wrote:
> On Thu Jun 05 20:41:05 2014, k...@roeckx.be wrote:
> > This is probably related to me not exporting those symbols as they are
> > marked local.
>
> Kurt
>
> Is this related to the way you build the Debian packages?
Yes. And
On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 03:01:47PM -0400, Mike Bland wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > When building the 1.0.1h release I got this error:
> > heartbeat_test.o: In function `set_up':
> > test/heartbeat_test.c:94: undefined reference to `ssl_init_wbio
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Kurt Roeckx via RT wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When building the 1.0.1h release I got this error:
> heartbeat_test.o: In function `set_up':
> test/heartbeat_test.c:94: undefined reference to `ssl_init_wbio_buffer'
> test/heartbeat_test.c:102: undefined reference to `ssl3_setup
10 matches
Mail list logo