t; Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2014 8:29 AM
> To: 'r...@openssl.org'
> Subject: RE: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
>
> We do have an open question in regards to DTLS/SCTP, and that is whether it
> is possible to send messages larger than 16K?
>
> In
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:20 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 28 Aug 2014, at 17:25, Brian Hassink via RT wrote:
> Hello Mi
Partial writes do not work over UDP; by design.
As to whether or not you can use a packet as big as 16K, in depends on the
"path MTU" -- what's the maximum transmission size between you and the
destination, along the communication path. You'll have to make your packets
smaller then that. This
ssage-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2014 12:20 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 28 Aug 2014, at 17:25, Brian Hassink via RT wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> We can co
Hello Michael,
We can confirm that the patch resolves the disconnect abort.
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
> To: Brian Hassink
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
>
> On 18 Aug 2014, at 21:47, Michael Tue
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
> To: Brian Hassink
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
>
> On 18 Aug 2014, at 21:47, Michael Tue
Hello Michael,
We can confirm that the patch resolves the disconnect abort.
Thanks,
Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG
Thanks, we're rolling a new build with it now...
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 18 Aug 2014,
Thanks, we're rolling a new build with it now...
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 3:33 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 18 Aug 2014,
atch
Description: Binary data
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:17 PM
>> To: Brian Hassink
>> Cc: openssl-dev@open
ption: Binary data
>
> Best regards
> Michael
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
>> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:17 PM
>> To: Brian Hassink
>> Cc: openssl-dev@open
n via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:17 PM
> To: Brian Hassink
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
>
>
> On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:32, Brian Hassink via RT wrote:
>
>> OpenSSL:
n via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:17 PM
> To: Brian Hassink
> Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
> Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
>
>
> On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:32, Brian Hassink via RT wrote:
>
>> OpenSSL:
Yes, this was observed for DTLS/SCTP.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:17 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:32, Brian
Yes, this was observed for DTLS/SCTP.
-Brian
-Original Message-
From: Michael Tüxen via RT [mailto:r...@openssl.org]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2014 6:17 PM
To: Brian Hassink
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: Re: [openssl.org #3470] [BUG] DTLS abort
On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:32, Brian
On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:32, Brian Hassink via RT wrote:
> OpenSSL: 1.0.1e
>
> OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5
> (Santiago)
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We recently did some negative testing against OpenSSL 1.0.1e, with a focus on
> DTLS, and o
On 22 Jul 2014, at 23:32, Brian Hassink via RT wrote:
> OpenSSL: 1.0.1e
>
> OS: Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.5
> (Santiago)
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We recently did some negative testing against OpenSSL 1.0.1e, with a focus on
> DTLS, and o
18 matches
Mail list logo
