RE: [openssl.org #894] bug report

2004-06-14 Thread Effi Ban via RT
Thanks for your prompt response - sorry if we jumped too quickly to the conclusion that something is wrong. Effi -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] via RT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 11:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [openssl.org #894] bug

Re: [openssl.org #894] bug report

2004-06-09 Thread Jim Schneider
This is most likely not a bug - the OpenSSL dynamic libraries allocate memory with an expected lifetime that is identical to the process lifetime. That this memory isn't lost can be demonstrated by the following code, which (as reported by valgrind on a Linux system) also "leaks" 21 blocks with

RE: [openssl.org #894] bug report

2004-06-09 Thread David Schwartz
> > To whom it may concern: > > We found that the following code fragment causes 21 memory leaks: > -- > -- > -- > #include > SSL_CTX* ctx = SSL_CTX_new(SSLv23_method()); > SSL_CTX_free(ctx); > -