ssl.org
Cc: Martin Del Vecchio
Subject: Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
Hi Martin,
Comments inline.
On October 28, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
> Yes, there are two different libubsec.so libraries:
>
> 1) The one built in OpenSSL with "./config shared&q
Hi Martin,
Comments inline.
On October 28, 2005 09:54 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
> Yes, there are two different libubsec.so libraries:
>
> 1) The one built in OpenSSL with "./config shared"; this
> is the stub library that contains "bind_engine", etc.
>
> 2) The one provided by the Br
L stub and the Broadcom
library
having the same name? Where should I place each in order for them both
to be
loaded?
Thanks again.
-----Original Message-
From: Geoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 10:10 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc:
On October 27, 2005 02:47 pm, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
> I get an error similar to what I was seeing before; it can't find the
> symbol
> 'ubsec_bytes_to_bits':
>
> error:2506406A:DSO support routines:DLFCN_BIND_FUNC:could not bind to
> the requested symbol name (dso_dlfcn.c:261)
>-> symname
BLE_REGISTER:init failed
(eng_table.c:161)
-Original Message-
From: Geoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:25 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: Martin Del Vecchio
Subject: Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
On October 25, 2005 11:06 am, Mart
eoff Thorpe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 9:25 PM
To: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Cc: Martin Del Vecchio
Subject: Re: Problem using Broadcom uBSec engine in 0.9.8
On October 25, 2005 11:06 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
> I'm still looking for help with this problem
Hi,
Further to Geoff's comments...
To load an engine from a shared library with 0.9.8 you
have to first load the dynamic engine. This is loaded
by calling ENGINE_load_builtin_engines() (along with
some others) or may be explicitly loaded with
ENGINE_load_dynamic(). I noticed that your test app
co
On October 25, 2005 11:06 am, Martin Del Vecchio wrote:
> I'm still looking for help with this problem.
>
> The uBSec support works in 0.9.7g with static linking.
> The uBSec support works in 0.9.7g with shared libraries.
> The uBSec support works in 0.9.8 with static linking.
> The uBSec support
I'm still looking for help with this problem.
The uBSec support works in 0.9.7g with static linking.
The uBSec support works in 0.9.7g with shared libraries.
The uBSec support works in 0.9.8 with static linking.
The uBSec support fails in 0.9.8 with shared libraries.
Here's a matrix:
