Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

> On Jan 25, 2018, at 5:11 AM, Richard Levitte wrote: > > This is confusing, and not what was intended. In other words, > openssl-project is *not* a new openssl-dev! If it was, I don't see > why we would even bother making a new list... It is moderated, and won't have

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

In message on Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:08:54 -0500, Viktor Dukhovni said: openssl-users> > If we agree that mailing lists are preferrable to openssl-users> > GitHub threads, then we should not close down openssl-users> >

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

Viktor Dukhovni wrote: >> On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >>> email clients are designed to handle hundreds to thousands of messages >>> a day, Github UI isn't > Indeed email is best for informal

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

> On Jan 24, 2018, at 1:25 PM, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre > wrote: > > Ok, I didn't know that. If anyone seriously participating on GitHub can > join the moderated openssl-project list then this sounds like a good > replacement for openssl-dev, because that list

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On 24.01.2018 19:08, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > Well, but we now have "openssl-project" for discussions of the > ongoing development of OpenSSL. It is mostly for team members, > but though it is moderated, IIRC others can join and post. Ok, I didn't know that. If anyone seriously participating

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

> On Jan 24, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre > wrote: > > As for the two mailing lists openssl-users and openssl-dev: It was always > my understanding that the former was for usability questions starting > from newbie questions up to very sophisticated

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

Viktor Dukhovni wrote: |> On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: |>> email clients are designed to handle hundreds to thousands of messages |>> a day, Github UI isn't | |Indeed email is best for informal ad-hoc back and forth

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On 24.01.2018 18:32, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > >> On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: >> >>> email clients are designed to handle hundreds to thousands of messages >>> a day, Github UI isn't > Indeed email is best for informal ad-hoc back and forth threaded

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

> On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:27 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > >> email clients are designed to handle hundreds to thousands of messages >> a day, Github UI isn't Indeed email is best for informal ad-hoc back and forth threaded discussion, while Github et. al. are for issue

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

Hubert Kario wrote: > that marking a conversation as ignored and going to next one is two key > combinations and less than a second, github ones require me to go to > the web UI which is slow, and if I have to view the issue because > subject is ambiguous it

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

* Hubert Kario: > when I mark project as followed I'm getting messages from all issues > and all PRs - likely dozens if not hundred messages a day But isn't that the point? My main concern with Github is that I have no record of my own actions. (Their single-account policy is also a problem

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

In message <8c351e82-600b-487e-aef3-a3f42cd23...@akamai.com> on Tue, 23 Jan 2018 14:38:14 +, "Salz, Rich via openssl-dev" said: openssl-dev> openssl-dev> ➢ For the lovers of NNTP: openssl-project has been added to news.gmane.org openssl-dev> as

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

➢ ah, true, I have those disabled because I use the same account for both my personal and my work projects so no single email address is correct for them At least we figured out the confusion! I have no good answer other than subject line filtering and forwarding, sorry. --

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 16:13:30 CET Salz, Rich wrote: > ➢ github ones require me to go to the web > UI which is slow > > I am confused by that. When someone posts an issue or comment, I get the > text emailed to me. Not just openssl, but all projects I watch. ah, true, I have those

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

➢ github ones require me to go to the web UI which is slow I am confused by that. When someone posts an issue or comment, I get the text emailed to me. Not just openssl, but all projects I watch. -- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe:

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On 23.01.2018 15:54, Hubert Kario wrote: > On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 15:36:26 CET Salz, Rich wrote: >> ➢ this feature sends notifications about _all_ conversations happening. >> >> For me, I get the actual comments that are posted. Don’t you? > when I comment in an issue/PR or mark it as

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 15:36:26 CET Salz, Rich wrote: > ➢ this feature sends notifications about _all_ conversations happening. > > For me, I get the actual comments that are posted. Don’t you? when I comment in an issue/PR or mark it as followed I'm getting only messages from that

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

➢ For the lovers of NNTP: openssl-project has been added to news.gmane.org as gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.project as readonly list. I will always have a fondness for NNTP :) But that reminds me to nudge the other mailing list distributors, and update the website. Thanks! --

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

➢ this feature sends notifications about _all_ conversations happening. For me, I get the actual comments that are posted. Don’t you? On the mailing list, you have to explicitly mark/junk conversation threads in your mail program. You would still have to do that here. I don’t understand

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On Tuesday, 23 January 2018 15:22:13 CET Salz, Rich wrote: > You should be able to just watch the openssl repo (the eyeball/watch notice > in the upper-right side) that's what I was talking about this feature sends notifications about _all_ conversations happening. > On 1/23/18, 7:00 AM,

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

Salz, Rich via open ssl-dev in gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.devel (Fri, 19 Jan 2018 17:34:57 +): >- New mailing list openssl-project for project discussions For the lovers of NNTP: openssl-project has been added to news.gmane.org as gmane.comp.encryption.openssl.project as readonly

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

You should be able to just watch the openssl repo (the eyeball/watch notice in the upper-right side) On 1/23/18, 7:00 AM, "Hubert Kario" wrote: On Friday, 19 January 2018 18:34:57 CET Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote: > There’s a new blog post at >

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

Hello, On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:00 PM, Hubert Kario wrote: > On Friday, 19 January 2018 18:34:57 CET Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote: > > There’s a new blog post at > > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/01/18/f2f-london/ > > > We decided to increase our use of

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On Friday, 19 January 2018 18:34:57 CET Salz, Rich via openssl-dev wrote: > There’s a new blog post at > https://www.openssl.org/blog/blog/2018/01/18/f2f-london/ > We decided to increase our use of GitHub. In addition to asking that all bug > reports and enhancement requests be reported as

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

On 1/19/18, 12:52, "Salz, Rich" wrote: >> It appears to me that you could use openssl-dev instead of openssl-project, >> saving cycles on killing >> one and creating the other. > > We discussed that, but it would be harder to “undo” if things don’t work > out, we wanted >

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

➢ It appears to me that you could use openssl-dev instead of openssl-project, saving cycles on killing one and creating the other. We discussed that, but it would be harder to “undo” if things don’t work out, we wanted to make it very clear that this is a new way of operating, and

Re: [openssl-dev] Blog post; changing in email, crypto policy, etc

It appears to me that you could use openssl-dev instead of openssl-project, saving cycles on killing one and creating the other. -- Regards, Uri Blumenthal On 1/19/18, 12:35, "openssl-dev on behalf of Salz, Rich via openssl-dev"