Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-23 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Lutz, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: >> Lutz Jaenicke wrote: >> [...] >> Do you want something like the attached patch ? >> (untested, I'm off to bed...) > Ok, I have reworked this section as discussed by using a buffering BIO an

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-22 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > [...] > >> * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO > >> will return a > >> 503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised > >> * in IMAP doing a STARTLS requires a > >> . CAPABILITY > >> first. > >> > >>

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-21 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Dr. Stephen Henson wrote: > On Wed, Feb 21, 2007, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > > >> Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: >> >>> Lutz Jaenicke wrote: >>> Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: >>> [...] >>> > * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO > will return a >

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-21 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007, Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > > Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > > > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > > [...] > > >> * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO > > >> will return a > > >> 503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised > > >> * in IMAP doing a STA

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-21 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > [...] > >> * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO > >> will return a > >> 503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised > >> * in IMAP doing a STARTLS requires a > >> . CAPABILITY > >> first. > >> > >>

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-19 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lutz Jaenicke wrote: > Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: [...] >> * in SMTP doing a STARTTLS without previous EHLO >> will return a >> 503 STARTTLS command used when not advertised >> * in IMAP doing a STARTLS requires a >> . CAPABILITY >> first. >> >>

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-19 Thread Lutz Jaenicke
Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote: > Hello Richard, > > Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 > 10:34:23 -0800, > > Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > kees> 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding > > kees> these features to

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-17 Thread Goetz Babin-Ebell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Richard, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:34:23 -0800, > Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > kees> 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding > kees> these fea

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-16 Thread Kees Cook
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 07:12:50PM +0100, Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker wrote: > Yes. Done. Thank you, and sorry you had to wait 3 years for this to > happen. Great! Thank you. :) -- Kees Cook@outflux.net ___

Re: STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-16 Thread Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:34:23 -0800, Kees Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: kees> 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding kees> these features to s_client. Can this please be applied to CVS? Yes. Done. Thank you, and sorry you had to wait 3 y

STARTTLS patch for imap and ftp

2007-02-16 Thread Kees Cook
Hello! 3 years ago, I wrote a patch[1] (and did the TSU[2]) for adding these features to s_client. Can this please be applied to CVS? I've seen other people on the mailing list asking for it[3], including fixes for HELO[4]. This is a pretty trivial patch, and would help a lot of people. I h