Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4673] a weird error, please help to check whether is it a but. thanks!

2016-09-12 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
these 2 servers is mirrow relationship. 2. I checked the pem file > (as attached), also is same on two servers3. I checked the error reason, but > cannot find any description about it in the website.I am almost crazy for > this issue, would you help to check what's the reason of th

Re: [openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4673] a weird error, please help to check whether is it a but. thanks!

2016-09-12 Thread openssl-us...@openssl.org via RT
these 2 servers is mirrow relationship. 2. I checked the pem file > (as attached), also is same on two servers3. I checked the error reason, but > cannot find any description about it in the website.I am almost crazy for > this issue, would you help to check what's the reason of th

[openssl-dev] [openssl.org #4673] a weird error, please help to check whether is it a but. thanks!

2016-09-12 Thread zy_chongqing via RT
the pem file (as attached), also is same on two servers3. I checked the error reason, but cannot find any description about it in the website.I am almost crazy for this issue, would you help to check what's the reason of this error for me? thanks a lot! my OS: Linux version 3.7.10-1.1-desktop (g

答复: RE: RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-10-01 Thread yuan.beng...@zte.com.cn via RT
I have got the reason. It's the problem of unzip tools. After I unzipped the files on windows, the file has some error. But when I unzip on SUSE, it's no problem. Thanks. ZTE Information Security Notice: The information co

答复: RE: RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-30 Thread yuan . bengang
I have got the reason. It's the problem of unzip tools. After I unzipped the files on windows, the file has some error. But when I unzip on SUSE, it's no problem. Thanks. ZTE Information Security Notice: The information co

RE: RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-25 Thread Salz, Rich via RT
Somehow the file that you have is corrupted. It is not corrupted in the tar file. It is a local error. I do not know what the error is but mdtest.c on your disk is WRONG. __ OpenSSL Project http:/

RE: RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-25 Thread Salz, Rich
Somehow the file that you have is corrupted. It is not corrupted in the tar file. It is a local error. I do not know what the error is but mdtest.c on your disk is WRONG.

答复: RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-25 Thread yuan.beng...@zte.com.cn via RT
Result as follow: -bash-3.00# wc -l md2test.c 0 md2test.c -bash-3.00# -bash-3.00# cat md2test.c dummytest.c-bash-3.00# -bash-3.00# ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transm

答复: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-25 Thread yuan.beng...@zte.com.cn via RT
md2test.c has no problem, I downloaded from openssl.org: http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.1i.tar.gz Thanks. "Rich Salz via RT" 2014-09-25 02:59 请答复 给 r...@openssl.org 收件人 yuan.beng...@zte.com.cn, 抄送 openssl-dev@openssl.org 主题 [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl

答复: RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-25 Thread yuan . bengang
Result as follow: -bash-3.00# wc -l md2test.c 0 md2test.c -bash-3.00# -bash-3.00# cat md2test.c dummytest.c-bash-3.00# -bash-3.00# ZTE Information Security Notice: The information contained in this mail (and any attachment transm

RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-24 Thread Salz, Rich via RT
The error makes no sense. The compiler is complaining about the include line? Do "wc -l md2test.c" -- Principal Security Engineer, Akamai Technologies IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz __ OpenSSL Proj

RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-24 Thread Salz, Rich
The error makes no sense. The compiler is complaining about the include line? Do "wc -l md2test.c" -- Principal Security Engineer, Akamai Technologies IM: rs...@jabber.me Twitter: RichSalz

[openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-24 Thread Rich Salz via RT
Somehow your md2test.c file is corrupted. Line 1 should be "#include " and the file has 48 lines. -- Rich Salz, OpenSSL dev team; rs...@openssl.org __ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Developm

RE: [openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-17 Thread Salz, Rich
> -DSHA512_ASM -DAES_ASM -DGHASH_ASM -c -o md2test.o md2test.c > md2test.c:1: error: syntax error before '.' token > md2test.c:1:12: warning: no newline at end of file Your copy of this file is corrupted. ; wc test/md2test.c 48 148 955 test/md2test.c ;

[openssl.org #3534] When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks.

2014-09-17 Thread yuan.beng...@zte.com.cn via RT
Hi, When I build openssl-1.0.1i on Solaris 10, there are some error, please help to check what is the reason. Thanks. making all in engines/ccgost... make[2]: Entering directory '/ybg/openssl-1.0.1i/engines/ccgost' make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'all'. make[2]: Leaving dir

Could you please tell me how the EVP_des_ede3_cbc routine is defined?...thanks

2004-02-23 Thread joe_wu
t find the mapped funtion for the asn1_cb funtion pointer, If anyone can tell me?...thanks. And there are also many funtions I can't find in the openssl library. Even like EVP_des_ede3_cbc() routine, I also don't know where the routine is, and where it's defintion is. If whic

Thanks

2000-05-17 Thread Allen J. Newton
Hi, My thanks to those who helped me with my OpenSSL/STunnel/EGD problem. I now have it installed and working correctly. I was a little stumbled at first by how to make a self-signed certificate for testing with Outlook, but found a FAQ for that, too. Great software! :-) (Boss is also a

Thanks

2000-05-12 Thread Amit Chopra
Hi, I have been using the OpenSSL package for about 3 months now. I have a licence from RSA for BSAFE SSL-C, but it didnot provide all the functionalities (like crypto, etc) and inspite of it being a packaged product, documentation was minimal and pathetic at best. This is what drove me to Ope

Re: RSA's BSAFE SSL-C toolkit (does anyone has experienced with this?) Thanks,

1999-11-03 Thread Steve Sampson
Forget it. 1) You can't find anyone to answer the phone 2) They don't answer email 3) When it's all said and done, you have no product to hold. I'm still waiting for them to answer my email and phone messages from two months ago. I understand they had a large turn-over, and may be re-organizing

RSA's BSAFE SSL-C toolkit (does anyone has experienced with this?) Thanks,

1999-11-03 Thread Abad, Leah
Does anyone had experience with RSA's BSAFE SSL-C toolkit? I saw something that said that the APIs are the same as with SSLeay (the predecessor to OpenSSL) Thanks, Leah __ OpenSSL Pr

RE: THANKS...

1999-08-18 Thread Salz, Rich
>Quite a bit of "noise" would be removed if this was >documented: even if just a digest of the answers >we've given. There are various auto-faq, distributed-faq, etc., tools around. The ones the python folks use (www.python.org) seems pretty nice -- maintains edit histories, etc., and breaks up

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-18 Thread Dr Stephen Henson
Ben Laurie wrote: > > Damien Miller wrote: > > > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > > > > Ben already tried Doxygen some time ago. And there are various > > > > similar approaches. Seems we've to evaluate most of them before > > > > we should stick with one. Ben, what were your latest

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-18 Thread Ben Laurie
Damien Miller wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Ben Laurie wrote: > > > > Ben already tried Doxygen some time ago. And there are various > > > similar approaches. Seems we've to evaluate most of them before > > > we should stick with one. Ben, what were your latest experiences > > > at this corner

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-18 Thread Damien Miller
On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Ben Laurie wrote: > > Ben already tried Doxygen some time ago. And there are various > > similar approaches. Seems we've to evaluate most of them before > > we should stick with one. Ben, what were your latest experiences > > at this corner? I ask, because I've to admit that

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-13 Thread Ben Laurie
"Ralf S. Engelschall" wrote: > > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > >> > >> OpenSSL 0.9.4 is now out and everyone can again keep on hacking for 0.9.5 (or > >> is it now finally time to start thinking about 1.0.0?). I'd like to thank all

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-09 Thread Daniel Reichenbach
> > Documentation would be very nice as well. I would be happy to assist in > writing API docs, but we should decide on a documentation standard. > > The GNOME people are getting good results with documents embedded in > the code itself. Using these API and developer documents are > automatically

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-09 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote: > On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: >> >> OpenSSL 0.9.4 is now out and everyone can again keep on hacking for 0.9.5 (or >> is it now finally time to start thinking about 1.0.0?). I'd like to thank all >> OpenSSL developers and all OpenSSL co

Re: THANKS...

1999-08-09 Thread Damien Miller
On Mon, 9 Aug 1999, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote: > > OpenSSL 0.9.4 is now out and everyone can again keep on hacking for 0.9.5 (or > is it now finally time to start thinking about 1.0.0?). I'd like to thank all > OpenSSL developers and all OpenSSL contributors for their efforts. Let's hope > 0.9.4

THANKS...

1999-08-09 Thread Ralf S. Engelschall
OpenSSL 0.9.4 is now out and everyone can again keep on hacking for 0.9.5 (or is it now finally time to start thinking about 1.0.0?). I'd like to thank all OpenSSL developers and all OpenSSL contributors for their efforts. Let's hope 0.9.4 is as stable (or even more stable) as the previous releas

Can you guys see this? Please reply...Thanks...Just testing...

1999-05-19 Thread Vincent Padua
__ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]