I've just received the suggestion to make sure the VMS installation
scripts make the executables execute-only. The corresponding on the
Unixly side would be to give the binaries the protection 711 instead
of 755. The reason would be that on a multiuser system, lusers
wouldn't be able to copy
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've just received the suggestion to make sure the VMS installation
scripts make the executables execute-only. The corresponding on the
Unixly side would be to give the binaries the protection 711 instead
of 755. The reason would be
At 11:57 03.06.99 +0200, you wrote:
I've just received the suggestion to make sure the VMS installation
scripts make the executables execute-only. The corresponding on the
Unixly side would be to give the binaries the protection 711 instead
of 755. The reason would be that on a multiuser
At 06:26 AM 6/3/99 -0500, William M. Perry wrote:
It would be silly to make this kind of change in the distribution. If you
are lucky enough to not be in the united states, then this type of
installation 'restriction' would be a hindrance. If someone in the US is
so paranoid they feel these
"Leland V. Lammert" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 06:26 AM 6/3/99 -0500, William M. Perry wrote:
It would be silly to make this kind of change in the distribution. If you
are lucky enough to not be in the united states, then this type of
installation 'restriction' would be a hindrance. If
