Hi there,
At 08:00 AM 4/7/00 +0200, Richard Levitte (in reply to mixmaster) wrote:
>mixmaster> The new dso stuff looks like a general purpose portable
>mixmaster> interface to shared libraries. If that is really all it is
[snip]
>mixmaster> What am I missing?
>
>That DSO is going to be used as
mixmaster> The new dso stuff looks like a general purpose portable
mixmaster> interface to shared libraries. If that is really all it is
mixmaster> then there's no real connection to OpenSSL at all and it
mixmaster> seems like it should be a library on it's own, outside
mixmaster> OpenSSL.
That
The new dso stuff looks like a general purpose portable interface to
shared libraries. If that is really all it is then there's no real
connection to OpenSSL at all and it seems like it should be a library
on it's own, outside OpenSSL.
What am I missing?
