Re: Quick question on verify a certificate

2012-03-27 Thread Akash Deo
Hi Ricky, Please have a look at following tutorial link http://etutorials.org/Programming/secure+programming/Chapter+10.+Public+Key+Infrastructure/10.5+Performing+X.509+Certificate+Verification+with+OpenSSL/ Above link could be of your help. Regards, Akash On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 6:44 PM, ric

Quick question on verify a certificate

2012-03-22 Thread ricardo brillon
I am trying to verify the server side certificate from a windows client and will need to also check if the certificate is revoke. I am not sure if I need to call "spc_x509store_setcrlfile(mp_x509Store,(char*)CrlFile).and spc_x509store_setcrlfile(mp_x509Store,(char*)CrlFile). as the below function

Re: Quick question on fips 1.2.3 running on windows

2011-09-07 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011, ricardo brillon wrote: > Steve Thanks. > On the issue to build against a newer OpenSSl. > I am calling ms/do_fips bat file to build the Fips OpenSSL .Can you point me > to > a doc that shows how to build against a different source base. >  Thanks so much for your help. You

Re: Quick question on fips 1.2.3 running on windows

2011-09-07 Thread ricardo brillon
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2011 10:48 PM Subject: Re: Quick question on fips 1.2.3 running on windows On Tue, Sep 06, 2011, ricardo brillon wrote: > I am new to openssl and have to created a OpennSSl Fips application in > windows. > I downloaded the openssl-fips-1.2.3.tar.gz and the 140s

Re: Quick question on fips 1.2.3 running on windows

2011-09-06 Thread Dr. Stephen Henson
On Tue, Sep 06, 2011, ricardo brillon wrote: > I am new to openssl and have to created a OpennSSl Fips application in > windows. > I downloaded the openssl-fips-1.2.3.tar.gz and the 140sp1051.pdf which is for > Fips 1.2.3 > I ranned the do_fips bat which build with no problem on VS2008. I ran th

Quick question on fips 1.2.3 running on windows

2011-09-06 Thread ricardo brillon
I am new to openssl and have to created a OpennSSl Fips application in windows. I downloaded the openssl-fips-1.2.3.tar.gz and the 140sp1051.pdf which is for Fips 1.2.3 I ranned the do_fips bat which build with no problem on VS2008. I ran the fips_test_suite.exe which ran without error(see below)

Re: CRYPTO_THREADID_* code in 0.9.9: come & gone again? [quick question]

2008-07-17 Thread Ger Hobbelt
> Yep, I'll also be reverting Bodo's original idptr_callback commit too. It Thanks for the info! Take care, Ger > turns out easier to fix threadid relative to what was pre-0.9.9 than to hack > it on top of existing stuff. So the first CRYPTO_THREADID attempt is gone, > but I won't revert Bodo'

Re: CRYPTO_THREADID_* code in 0.9.9: come & gone again? [quick question]

2008-07-17 Thread Geoff Thorpe
On Wednesday 16 July 2008 16:58:11 Ger Hobbelt wrote: > Hi, > > Sorry to bother, but just a quick question: those new threadid > handling routines that got into 0.9.9 a while ago disappeared from the > latest CVS (today) again. I assume this is intentional? > Just a Yes

CRYPTO_THREADID_* code in 0.9.9: come & gone again? [quick question]

2008-07-17 Thread Ger Hobbelt
Hi, Sorry to bother, but just a quick question: those new threadid handling routines that got into 0.9.9 a while ago disappeared from the latest CVS (today) again. I assume this is intentional? Just a Yes/No 's all I crave. Thanks for answering and keep it up! -- Met vriendelijke gr

Re: quick question..

2000-02-11 Thread Bodo Moeller
Erik Aronesty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I have an app working very well... *except* i now want (need?) to > accurately determine if it's "ok to write" (will not block) or "ok to > read". Without SSL, I could do this with a select().. however a > select() is clearly not correct when using SSL. Set

quick question..

2000-02-09 Thread Erik Aronesty
I have an app working very well... *except* i now want (need?) to accurately determine if it's "ok to write" (will not block) or "ok to read".  Without SSL, I could do this with a select().. however a select() is clearly not correct when using SSL.   However, SSL_pending() (i think...) only