At 01:01 23.04.99 +0200, you wrote:
Any comments / additions ?
The question is what to do about name conflicts with applications.
For example an application might also definite "bool".
Drop it ?
Since it is only defined on sun/sparc it seems to be a bad idea
to define it at all...
By
Goetz
Hi,
I like the idea, can you include a Win32 platform
in the head file.
Zhigang
--- Chris Jalbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/21/1999 1:49 AM, Goetz Babin-Ebell enlightened
me with the following:
Perhaps we should clear sizes of data types.
Perhaps something like:
typedef char
At 00:26 22.04.99 -0700, you wrote:
Hi,
Hallo,
I like the idea, can you include a Win32 platform
in the head file.
Whatever we do, we should decide to do it quickly.
There seem to be hiding a lot of size dependencies in the code...
The file has some disadvantages:
1. There are no processor
On 4/21/1999 1:49 AM, Goetz Babin-Ebell enlightened me with the following:
Perhaps we should clear sizes of data types.
Perhaps something like:
typedef char int8;
typedef unsigned char uint8;
typedef short int16;
typedef unsigned short uint16;
typedef long
