Hello!
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Yet I find it a bit too puzzling... After I've replied I came to realize
that no-sse2/386 shouldn't actually affect the referred test
Hello!
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Yet I find it a bit too puzzling... After I've replied I came to realize
that no-sse2/386 shouldn't actually affect the referred test
(gdb) bt
#0 0x281330a1 in bn_mul_add_words () from ./libcrypto.so.0.9.8
(gdb) info r
eax0x30281d48 807935304
(gdb) disassemble
Dump of assembler code for function bn_mul_add_words:
0x28133090 bn_mul_add_words+32: call 0x28133095
bn_mul_add_words+37
0x28133095
Hello!
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Yet I find it a bit too puzzling... After I've replied I came to realize
that no-sse2/386 shouldn't actually affect the referred test
Hello!
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Yet I find it a bit too puzzling... After I've replied I came to realize
that no-sse2/386 shouldn't actually affect the referred test
Hello!
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Run ./config -t. Does it suggest any extra flags to ./Configure, such as
386? If it does, then I'd recommend to pass it down to
Hello!
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Andy Polyakov via RT wrote:
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Run ./config -t. Does it suggest any extra flags to ./Configure, such as
386? If it does, then I'd recommend to pass it down to
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Run ./config -t. Does it suggest any extra flags to ./Configure, such as
386? If it does, then I'd recommend to pass it down to ./Configure when
latter is invoked manually.
Thank you, it helps.
, 2005 1:30 AM
Cc: openssl-dev@openssl.org
Subject: [openssl.org #1146] [BUG] Segfault on FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0
Hello!
I've found a SEGFAULT using FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38
GMT 2003 in bntest.
Build is configured with
./Configure -ggdb BSD-x86-elf shared zlib
make report
Hello!
I've found a SEGFAULT using FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38
GMT 2003 in bntest.
Build is configured with
./Configure -ggdb BSD-x86-elf shared zlib
make report:
=
OpenSSL self-test report:
OpenSSL version: 0.9.8-beta7-dev
Last change: Correct
Hello!
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
On Mon, 4 Jul 2005, Dmitry Belyavsky via RT wrote:
I've found a SEGFAULT using FreeBSD 4.8-RELEASE #0: Thu Apr 3 10:53:38
GMT 2003 in bntest.
Build is configured with
./Configure -ggdb
Sorry, I've forgotten to mention I use 20050627 snapshot and
./config -g shared zlib works fine.
Run ./config -t. Does it suggest any extra flags to ./Configure, such as
386? If it does, then I'd recommend to pass it down to ./Configure when
latter is invoked manually.
I've found a SEGFAULT
12 matches
Mail list logo
