-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
OpenSSL version 3.0 alpha 4 released
OpenSSL - The Open Source toolkit for SSL/TLS
https://www.openssl.org/
OpenSSL 3.0 is currently in alpha.
OpenSSL 3.0 alpha 4 has now been made available.
In light of how the discussion evolved I would say that not only there
is consensus on supporting the definition of a detailed policy on
backports and the definitions of what are the requirements for regular
releases vs LTS releases (other than the longer support timeframe),
but also highlights a n
Since already a few backporting requests to 1.1.1 have accumulated which are
controversial
or not allowed for an LTS release, would it make sense to consider creating a
new 1.1.2 STS
branch which could then receive such changes?
Matthias
On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 14:49 +, Dr. Matthias St. Pierre wrote:
> Since already a few backporting requests to 1.1.1 have accumulated
> which are controversial
> or not allowed for an LTS release, would it make sense to consider
> creating a new 1.1.2 STS
> branch which could then receive such cha
On 25/06/2020 15:33, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
> In light of how the discussion evolved I would say that not only there
> is consensus on supporting the definition of a detailed policy on
> backports and the definitions of what are the requirements for regular
> releases vs LTS releases (other than t
Sorry yes, I meant to refer to the open PR with the s390 support, I picked
the wrong number!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020, 17:54 Matt Caswell wrote:
>
>
> On 25/06/2020 15:33, Nicola Tuveri wrote:
> > In light of how the discussion evolved I would say that not only there
> > is consensus on supporting t
topic: Change some words by accepting PR#12089
Proposed by Mark Cox
Public: yes
opened: 2020-06-25
