Re: Reordering new API's that have a libctx, propq

On 21/09/2020 10:59, Matt Caswell wrote: > > > On 16/09/2020 16:56, Matt Caswell wrote: >>> "Adopt the coding style policy on function arguments as shown in chapter >>> 6.1 of web PR 194 (commit 7b45b46d71f)" > > This vote failed: > > accepted: no (for: 2, against: 5, abstained: 2, not vot

Re: When "failed CI" isn't a blocker

Didn't see any response one way or the other so I'll create a 'ignore ci failure' label, change the bot logic to deal with it, and go through the stale things in the failed CI state. Mark On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 11:15 AM Mark J Cox wrote: > > So when we have a PR in a state where any CI is marked

Re: Reordering new API's that have a libctx, propq

On 16/09/2020 16:56, Matt Caswell wrote: >> "Adopt the coding style policy on function arguments as shown in chapter >> 6.1 of web PR 194 (commit 7b45b46d71f)" This vote failed: accepted: no (for: 2, against: 5, abstained: 2, not voted: 2) >> >> "Adopt the coding style policy on extending e