Re: Assigning OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta1 issues

2020-10-14 Thread Salz, Rich
On 14/10/2020 17:08, Salz, Rich wrote: > I am interested in helping out with the deprecation tasks. Should I assume that Richard's PR to change how it's done will be going in? > I'm not sure which of Richard's PRs you're referring to? I thought he had a "rethinking how we

Re: Assigning OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta1 issues

2020-10-14 Thread Matt Caswell
On 14/10/2020 17:08, Salz, Rich wrote: > I am interested in helping out with the deprecation tasks. Should I assume > that Richard's PR to change how it's done will be going in? > I'm not sure which of Richard's PRs you're referring to? Matt

Re: Assigning OpenSSL 3.0.0 beta1 issues

2020-10-14 Thread Salz, Rich
I am interested in helping out with the deprecation tasks. Should I assume that Richard's PR to change how it's done will be going in?

Re: OTC VOTE: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch

2020-10-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 02:02:29PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote: > topic: The PR #11359 (Allow to continue with further checks on > UNABLE_TO_VERIFY_LEAF_SIGNATURE) is acceptable for 1.1.1 branch > As the change is borderline on bug fix/behaviour change OTC needs > to decide whether it is acceptable

Re: VOTE: Technical Items still to be done

2020-10-14 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Thu, Oct 08, 2020 at 03:47:18PM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote: > topic: The following items are required prerequisites for the first beta > release: > 1) EVP is the recommended API, it must be feature-complete compared with > the functionality available using lower-level APIs. >- Anything