0
On Tue, 10 Aug 2021 12:54:19 +0200,
Matt Caswell wrote:
>
> topic: RSA public exponent validation in 3.0 for the default provider
> should be
> consistent with 1.1.1
> Comment: See issue #16255 for background
> Proposed by Matt Caswell
> Public: yes
> opened: 2021-08-10
> closed: 2021-mm-dd
> a
This vote is now closed.
accepted: yes (for: 4, against: 2, abstained: 3, not voted: 1)
On 10/08/2021 11:54, Matt Caswell wrote:
topic: RSA public exponent validation in 3.0 for the default provider
should be
consistent with 1.1.1
Comment: See issue #16255 for background
Proposed by Matt Cas
On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 11:54:19AM +0100, Matt Caswell wrote:
> topic: RSA public exponent validation in 3.0 for the default provider should
> be
> consistent with 1.1.1
I think this is one of those conflicts between providing a general
crypto library, and providing something that is secure by def
0
Pauli
On 10/8/21 8:54 pm, Matt Caswell wrote:
topic: RSA public exponent validation in 3.0 for the default provider
should be
consistent with 1.1.1
Comment: See issue #16255 for background
Proposed by Matt Caswell
Public: yes
opened: 2021-08-10
closed: 2021-mm-dd
accepted: yes/no (for: X,
-1
> -Original Message-
> From: openssl-project On Behalf Of Matt
> Caswell
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2021 12:54 PM
> To: openssl-project@openssl.org
> Subject: OTC VOTE: RSA public exponent validation in 3.0
>
> topic: RSA public exponent validation in 3.0 for the default provider
>
