David von Oheimb wrote:
> To avoid any misunderstandings on what I wrote before:
> My proposal (possibly in difference to Dmitry's) was and still is *not* to
> move any functionality out of the OpenSSL main repository,
> but to re-arrange the library structure (likely by splitting
So one of the ways to handle a transition that I've thought about a number
of times would be the following.
1) We split things out into multiple separate libraries.
2) We keep a combined library around using the current names which has all
the split libraries joined together.
So people who want t
Just moving things around in the source tree does not achieve much so
without the actual splitting the functionality out of the libcrypto
does not make sense to me. Maybe it could be seen as a preparation step
for the split out.
However yes, it was a misunderstanding IMO that we would want to spli
On 07.07.22 23:02, Tim Hudson wrote:
I do not think this makes sense at this stage at all.
One of the key elements people are looking for when contributing code
is the distribution vector of getting including in default OS
distributions and standard builds.
I fully agree.
To avoid any misun
