> Is the following reasonable to do on a call to SSL_read()? Will it
> return the propper error string?
> if( ( nReturnVal = SSL_read( con, cReadBuffer, READ_BUFFER_SIZE ) ) < 1 ) {
> unsigned long nErrorVal = SSL_get_error( con, nReturnVal );
> char *cErrorString = ERR_error_string(
>> Maybe I am blind, but I have not been able to locate a list of
>> errors that are returned by SSL_get_error(). If anyone can point me
>> in the right direction I would appreciate it.
>
>What about the implementation of SSL_get_error? Or ssl.h.
Sorry about the elementary questions. I am obv
Ed Eddington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The problem I noticed was in the "make_form" logic. In creating the
> key-value pairs for the request, this routine leaves a trailing '=' if the
> last key has no value. MY code was leaving a trailing '=' already. Then
> "make_form" added a second trai
>> < Firstly you should run Configure:
>> <
>> < > perl Configure VC-WIN32
>> <
>> < Next you need to build the Makefiles and optionally the assembly language
>>
>> < files.
>> [...]
> I'm sorry, but for me what to do for this step was not obvious.
I've now changed
>>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Maybe I am blind, but I have not been able to locate a list of
> errors that are returned by SSL_get_error(). If anyone can point me
> in the right direction I would appreciate it.
What about the implementation of SSL_get_error? Or ssl.h.
#define SSL_ERROR_NONE
Howard Uman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> When I issue my usual request to ./Configure the openssl-SNAP-19990802, I
> have been using "solaris-usparc-cc" as my compiler, but that option appears
> to be gone This worked as recently as the openssl-SNAP19990725 file.
> What to do?
Simply trying "./co
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
sampo> That symbol is supposed to come from libssl.a. Please check with
sampo> nm. Then verify or experiment with compiler flags to see that it is
sampo> indeed getting linked. Investigate if this has anything to do with
sampo> OpenSSL library being dyna
"Simon J. Gerraty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> The comment in ssl_lib.c says: [...]
>> This says what was changed, but gives no justification for it.
>> Is there some class of problem which is solved by this change?
Yes. The code that handled all those data structures (and used the
SSL_CTX's cert
Maybe I am blind, but I have not been able to locate a list of errors that are
returned by SSL_get_error(). If anyone can point me in the right direction I would
appreciate it.
Alternatively, can anyone tell me what an error 6 is after a call to SSL_read()?
Thank you in advance.
Chris
Ge
Tran Duc Trung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Miguel Ángel Monjas Llorente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Any clue?
>
> I had to modify Makefile.PL to be able to compile
>
> 1) added .exe suffix to the test of executability of openssl
>
> orig:
> until (-x "$openssl_path/bin/openssl") {
>
Lars Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>
> sampo> I just wrapped a new release. This is quite rough and badly tested
> sampo> release so if you are in production environment and happy with 1.03,
> sampo> don't upgrade yet. If on the other hand you have
"Miguel Angel Fraga" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I got a lot of errors, so after some changes it looks better...
> but i don't know how to resolve this error message (and i don't
> know if it is the last one...):
>
> Microsoft (R) 32-bit C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 12.00.8168 for 80x86
>
When I issue my usual request to ./Configure the openssl-SNAP-19990802, I
have been using "solaris-usparc-cc" as my compiler, but that option appears
to be gone This worked as recently as the openssl-SNAP19990725 file.
What to do?
Thanks -H
~
Howard Uman - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Netegrity, Inc.,
I noticed a "slight" bug in the previous version Net::SSleay-0.9.1c
generating the HTTPS POST request (post_https). It may be present in the
new release, I don't know.
The problem I noticed was in the "make_form" logic. In creating the
key-value pairs for the request, this routine leaves a tra
Tran Duc Trung wrote:
>
> Miguel Ángel Monjas Llorente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > [...]
> >
> > has anyone tested the Windows support?
> >
> > I've seen that the Makefile.PL is almost the same. So, I haven't been
> > able to make anything.
> >
> > Any clue?
>
> I had to modify Makefile.P
A long time coming...
ftp://ftp.quick.com.au/pub/sjg/SSLrsh-2.2.0.tar.gz
contains the latest version of SSLr* which builds ok against OpenSSL-0.9.3a
Also, for those wanting shared libs:
ftp://ftp.quick.com.au/pub/sjg/build-openssl-093a.tar.gz
contains BSD Makefiles (and a perl script for gene
Bodo Moeller writes:
>"Simon J. Gerraty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> A quick look though CHANGES and apps/* did not show much in the way
>> of API changes [...] but after a successful call to
>> SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file(), SSL_get_certificate(ssl_con) returns
>> NULL.
>Actually this may be mention
Hi i am trying to generate a working set of certs for an Apachessl server
using openssl 0.9.3a .. everything seems to generate okay ,
but when installing the crts in a secure server it hangs on start.
with this error message
[Tue Aug 3 12:02:52 1999] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting t
Hello,
hope not to bore anybody here, but I'm new to the list and to
SSLeay/OpenSSL.
I suppose OpenSSL is the evolution of SSLeay, and began testing with SSLeay.
I got SSLeay, and did some tests on my NT machine using SSLeay binaries ;
now I'd like to do a simple application, which gets an ascii
Hi Tim -
> Moving a site from an old Stronghold DEC UNIX Alpha server to a
> Solaris 2.6 server running
>
> Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) ApacheJServ/1.0 PHP/3.0.9 mod_perl/1.19
> mod_ssl/2.3.1 OpenSSL/0.9.3a.
>
> The site in question uses SSL and everything works just fine for
> recent MS and
Hi Daniel,
Thanks a lot for the tip. I think for some newbies (such as myself),
the second step isn't very clear - would there be anything wrong with
making it more explicit (i.e. writing out the command, or an example)?
I will try to read more carefully in the future.
--Brian
"Daniel Reiche
Hi,
> Read on in INSTALL.W32.
>
> < Firstly you should run Configure:
> <
> < > perl Configure VC-WIN32
> <
> < Next you need to build the Makefiles and optionally the assembly language
>
> < files.
> [...]
I'm sorry, but for me what to do for this step was not obvious.
Since I am new to
> Re-ordering everything so that the first call to SSL_new() is after the
> reading of the private key will complicate things in ugly ways. And that
Yay! Sorry for the noise. The addition of SSL_CTX_set_verify() and
SSL_CTX_set_cipher_list() mean that I can indeed defer calling
SSL_new() until
Bodo Moeller writes:
>"Simon J. Gerraty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>Actually this may be mentioned in CHANGES, because the problem
>could be that the program first calls SSL_new and then
>SSL_CTX_use_PrivateKey_file:
Hmmm. Yes, when it wants to defer reading the PEM pass phrase until
it is known to be
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 10:33:21AM +0200, Anssi Bragge wrote:
> I've built a dedicated SSL-server with SSLeay (not WWW server) and it
> has run smoothly for it's purpose. Now, I was just fooling around and
> did a 'stupid' test with connecting to the port with Netscape, and was
> surprised
Hi guys!
I'm using an apache 1.3.1 Web Server
with mod_ssl 2.0.10. Also installed is SSLeay-o.9.0b.
Can anybody help me: Now I want to
use OpenSSL because I read a lot about it and I am very interested in it. But
how can I manage this. Is it possible to use OpenSSL instead of SSLeay with
Miguel Ángel Monjas Llorente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [...]
>
> has anyone tested the Windows support?
>
> I've seen that the Makefile.PL is almost the same. So, I haven't been
> able to make anything.
>
> Any clue?
I had to modify Makefile.PL to be able to compile
1) added .exe suffix
Hi,
I've built a dedicated SSL-server with SSLeay (not WWW server) and it
has run smoothly for it's purpose. Now, I was just fooling around and
did a 'stupid' test with connecting to the port with Netscape, and was
surprised at the result.
The server ran smoothly past the SSL_ac
28 matches
Mail list logo
