Hi Aslam,
- Original Message -
From: "Aslam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, 02 March, 2001 21:27
Subject: Is it a bug...
> Hi,
>
> I'm using openssl-0.9.6, and when I'm trying to obtain a root certificate,
> I'm getting an error:
>
> Using configuration from /
> From: Joseph Ashwood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > From: "Darryl Wagoner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: security in small signatures
> > I was wondering if using a 6 characters check signature (0-9A-Z)
> > could provide any trust level?
> > Are we talking about mins, hours, days or weeks to
Use BIO pairs. Then you can do the I/O any way that you want.
DS
- Original Message -
From: Teemu Piiroinen
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2001 6:22 AM
Subject: Overlapped I/O
Hi...
Is it possible to use OpenSSL with overlapped I/O and
if it's possible, how
Hi,
I'm using openssl-0.9.6, and when I'm trying to obtain a root certificate,
I'm getting an error:
Using configuration from /usr/local/ssl/openssl.cnf
Unable to load config info
Also the program then terminates..
Do see this, and help me in this.
Bye
Aslam
_
- Original Message -
From: "Darryl Wagoner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: security in small signatures
> I was wondering if using a 6 characters check signature (0-9A-Z)
> could provide any trust level?
> Are we talking about mins, hours, days or weeks to crack?
You'd be looking at a fract
Greetings,
One of the possible goals of my open Trusted QSL (QSL in amateur radio
means ACK) is to have a small check signature to validate contacts.
I was wondering if using a 6 characters check signature (0-9A-Z)
could provide any trust level? Maybe us the first character as
an starting offset
