> Alexander op de Weegh wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> if I use the following code to generate a PKCS#7 signed and enveloped
> message, I think the message created is not valid.
>
> X509 *signer, *recipient;
> RSA *signkey;
> p7 = PKCS7_new();
> PKCS7_set_type(p7, NID_pkcs7_signedAndEnveloped);
> PKCS7_
Duhhh. Of course, a foolish code error, declaring bytesWritten as size_t
rather than int and comparing with 0.
Thanks for your tolerance. I'm regularly amazed by the good humour that you
all show to idiot users.
G.
-Original Message-
From: Lutz Jaenicke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I am having problem encrytping and then decrypting messages using RSA
withthe padding set to RSA_NO_PADDING. Most messages work, but some of
them don't. By don't I mean the encryption/decryption process works fine
except that the decrypted message is nothnig like the original! I have
attached
In the ssl state machine, there are additional state with prefix "_MT_".
Is this for multi-thread? In which case the state machine will go to
these states? Is there a API to control it?
Thanks.
Zhong
#define SSL3_MT_HELLO_REQUEST 0
#define SSL3_MT_CLIENT_HELLO
I am building and installing openssl-0.9.6b on a Solaris 8 box. I am
getting an erro when I try to 'make install'. Any thoughts? I'm not
hugely familiar with make files, so this could be pretty simple.
# which make
/usr/ccs/bin/make
# which cc
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc
# ./config shared no-rc5 --pre
I've been tuning up my code and am now trying to locate sources of what
appears to be some leaking memory. I've searched the archives and saw
a bit of discussion about compiling with -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG set. When I did
so there was no indication that any sort of leaks were even trying to be
detected
hi,
what is the trick that java plugin 1.3.0_02 recognizes the demoCA generated
by "CA.pl -newca" as a valid CA?
i included the demoCA-cert file "/usr/local/ssl/misc/demoCA/cacert.pem"
into the global JDK keystore "jdk1.3.0_02\jre\lib\security\cacerts" as a
trusted party.
nevertheless keys ge
This question seems to be coming up more frequently! The message you
encrypt must be *less* than the modulus.
Greg Stark
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick Mackinlay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesd
You have attempted to send email address at cardsoft that is not recognised. Please
check the email address used.
Cardsoft email addresses are
either
e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for double names use "-"e.g. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for chinese names the double name format and place given names
Hi:
Could you help me answer this question? I was not able to conclude one way
or the other by browsing the source (crypto/engine/vendor-defns). Which
piece of code would I look to see how the offload is performed?
Thanks,
ganesh.
___
Ganesh Venkatesan
LAN Access Divi
Title: Hi
Hi 2 all,
I am a new subscriber to this mailing list. I just
started my work on SSH i.e I am a novice to this field of encrytpion.
I want to port PKCS#1 ver 1.5 for my SSH ver 1. In
the open source from SSL it's PKCS ver 2 which I can't use.
Can any one of you
Hello,
Is there somewhere example source code available,
how you do X509v3 extension checking with the ssleay library ? I am more
specifically interested in which and how the data structures are allocated to
check the extensions.
thanks,
Filip
12 matches
Mail list logo