What you found is for self-signed certificates...not sure if this is
what you want. Kind of too simplistic. What most faqs should steer
useres towards is not self-signed server certs, but a self-signed
ca...from which all else derives.
In my server setup for my home office/lab...I have a self-s
Found a solution in the list archives from last month.
http://www.moser-willi.at/doc/howto/docs/AutoSSL/
That script works great!!! Thanks much.
- Original Message -
From: "Waitman C. Gobble, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2003 12:28 AM
Su
Hello,
I am positive that there is a perl module, there just has to be. I
haven't used it though.
If you aren't exactly stuck on perl, you might have a look at the
openssl functions in php:
http://us3.php.net/manual/en/ref.openssl.php
Take care,
Waitman Gobble
EMK Design
Telephone (714) 522-
Hello,
We're looking to deploy Linux-based security
appliances that only provide the end-user with a web front-end.
We want the end-user to have the ability to
generate new (self-signed) certificates and SSL keys to be used on the appliance
under Apache mod_ssl once installed.
I'm bet
At 09:35 PM 10/14/2003 +0200, Peter 'Luna' Runestig writeth:
>[reposting this, that I posted on Friday. seems to have been lost, maybe
>because I happened to post from a non-subscribed address (although that
>should be fine according to majordomo and the web site).]
>
>Hi all,
>
>I posted a message
I have noticed that when signing SPKAC vs. a PKCS10 request, the
resulting -out is in a different format.
For example:
"openssl ca -in request.spkac -spkac -out cert1.file" results in a DER
file where
"openssl ca -in request.pkcs10 -out cert2.file" results in a PKCS10 PEM file
Ideally, depen
[reposting this, that I posted on Friday. seems to have been lost, maybe
because I happened to post from a non-subscribed address (although that
should be fine according to majordomo and the web site).]
Hi all,
I posted a message (or three actually) about this to openssl-dev little
more than a ye
--On Tuesday, October 14, 2003 11:02 AM -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a Mac programmer, but I'm playing proxy for them. We will need
to support Mac down to OS9 and I'd like an idea how they will seed the
PRNG. For instance, on Windows there's at least a last resort of
RAND_screen(). On
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 Oct 2003 12:46:37 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
KOverton> Is there any such thing as a consensus on which branch is
KOverton> preferred? Is there anything hugely new in the 0.9.7 branch
KOverton> that I may want to avoid for a widely distributed
KOverto
Is there any such thing as a consensus on which branch is preferred? Is there anything hugely new in the 0.9.7 branch that I may want to avoid for a widely distributed application?
TIA,
-- kov
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:17:44 -0700 (PDT), Kabher Khan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kabherkhan> I am Kabheer.I just started woorking with OpenSSL few
kabherkhan> days back.i intaleed "openssl-engine-0.9.6k" and
kabherkhan> builded the samples in VC++ environment.W
At 11:02 AM 10/14/2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not a Mac programmer, but I'm playing proxy for them. We will need to
support Mac down to OS9 and I'd like an idea how they will seed the
PRNG. For instance, on Windows there's at least a last resort of
RAND_screen(). On the MacOS 10 syste
Hi
All
I am Kabheer.I just started woorking with OpenSSL few days back.i intaleed "openssl-engine-0.9.6k" and builded the samples in VC++ environment.When i am trying to generate keys on my nCipher HSM by running the command
*
OpenSSL> genrsa
I'm not a Mac programmer, but I'm playing proxy for them. We will need to support Mac down to OS9 and I'd like an idea how they will seed the PRNG. For instance, on Windows there's at least a last resort of RAND_screen(). On the MacOS 10 systems they probably have some sort of /dev/random avail
14 matches
Mail list logo
