Hi Ng Pheng Siong,
enjoyed reading yr rant and rave ;)
Yes that is what i'm trying to understand. All this time i thought only the
webserver i need to worry on how to configure a server certificate and to
control which location to switch on the prompting of client cert. AppServer,
i thought i don'
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 12:54:43PM +0800, Sivasakthi (sakthi) wrote:
> Does anyone know how the 2 works together with regards to Client
> Certificate SSL connection ?
When I dealt with this stuff in a previous life, the WebSphere - called the
"application server" - is usually placed behind a web s
Hi,
Does anyone know how the 2 works together with
regards to Client Certificate SSL connection ?
.sakthi
Hello,
Whereas it is simple to read SMIME signed emails in
clients like Outlook etc, how can we read SMIME signed
email in web-based email services like yahoo, hotmail
etc.
Emails are received as p7k attachment. I tried
downloading it and renaming to .EML, but did not help.
Any suggestions or po
- Original Message -
From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 9:34 PM
Subject: RE: OpenSSL: threading question
> Except that all but one processor would be sitting idle and if any piece
of
> your code ever blocked (say, due to a p
Hi list,
Does anyone know of any implementations for certificate enrollment that fit easily and
work well
with OpenSSL? I'm at the research phase, looking at options...
Thanks!
Mike Gagnon
__
OpenSSL Project
> > The irony is that on Windows, with IOCP, it's even more common to have
> > concurrent reads and writes to the same socket handled by different
> > threads.
> > IOCP throws read and write events into the same event queue because you
> > associate a socket with a completion port!
> IOCP ? Are y
Michael Lee wrote:
In my multithreaded HTTPS server application running on Windows 2000,
SSL_accept() occasionally returns -1 and SSL_get_error() returns
SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL when there are many simultaneous connections. A rough
figure is about 1 SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL in every 100 SSL_accept(). Neither th
Jeff Fulmer wrote:
Hi,
I'm the author of siege, an open source http regression tester. I
recently started to recieve complaints from users on Red Hat 9.0
systems. Apparently openssl is built with kerberos support on red
hat 9.0 and it requires krb5.h which is in /usr/kerberos/include
How can
Hello OpenSSL and ModSSL users,
I am running apache-1.3.29, mod_ssl-2.8.16-1.3.29, and openssl 0.9.7c.
Users at a specific lan on the internet accessing our cgi application
sometimes lock at some random place in our application. Once this
happens, it will lock up again at the same page if the
Hi,
I'm the author of siege, an open source http regression tester. I
recently started to recieve complaints from users on Red Hat 9.0
systems. Apparently openssl is built with kerberos support on red
hat 9.0 and it requires krb5.h which is in /usr/kerberos/include
How can I detect if openssl w
On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 18:03, Schuyler Stultz wrote:
> Ole Hansen wrote:
>
> >I now pass the 32 bytes (after the 5 bytes Record Layer Header) to my
> >decrypt function and I expected a result that at least had the handshake
> >protocol header as the first 4 bytes indicating the handshake type (20)
- Original Message -
From: "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 11:39 AM
Subject: RE: OpenSSL: threading question
>
> > [I suspect (based on the all-caps spelling of SOCKET and the sample
> > code provided earlier) that Mr. Giudicel
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Bruni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: OpenSSL: threading question
>
> On Jan 6, 2004, at 12:47 AM, David Schwartz wrote:
>
> >> In most cases multi threads and only one SOCKET don't rea
I've been playing with building software on our test Solaris 9 machine
using GCC 3.3.2. Recently I ran across a problem with Open SSL 0.9.7c
- I was able to build it as 64 bit, but make test failed with the
following error:
error calculating RIPEMD160 on ''
got c12836ad0d061da6ccde02fb0b5be87f0c62
> [I suspect (based on the all-caps spelling of SOCKET and the sample
> code provided earlier) that Mr. Giudicelli speaks from a Windows
> perspective, which doesn't handle multiple processes very well, and
> certainly does not abstract tcp sockets into simple file descriptors
> the way unix does.
In my multithreaded HTTPS server application running on Windows 2000,
SSL_accept() occasionally returns -1 and SSL_get_error() returns
SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL when there are many simultaneous connections. A rough
figure is about 1 SSL_ERROR_SYSCALL in every 100 SSL_accept(). Neither the
preceding calls t
On Jan 6, 2004, at 12:47 AM, David Schwartz wrote:
In most cases multi threads and only one SOCKET don't really get
along.
I'm not sure why you'd say that. For TCP, reading and writing are
totally
independent. Using a pool of threads for I/O is quite common to protect
against ambush (when an op
> In any event if you end up having a MUTEX, you would be better
> off with only
> one thread accessing both queues.
Well that's what the mutex gives you.
> That would even allow you to implement a priority algo, which wouldn't be
> the case with a simple MUTEX. You could give more prior
19 matches
Mail list logo
