Hi Nils,
Maybe there was really something wrong with this xml file.
But I have an other xml file which was also signed with ecdsa.
The signature value is
Xa4w7I1obBULyZoZRuq5UHIwQVle8NmugYafWWaOU+GoWgp2e745PA7DTT0xztaH
And the result with BIO_f_base64() is.
+ sigbuf 0x0308b668 "]®0ìhlÉ
Hi!
I am having troubles to understand whats the difference between openssl dgst
-sha1 -sign and openssl dgst -sha1 -binary | openssl -rsautl -sign
The output is completely different and trying to verify one signature
produced by one method with the other method brings a padding error...
Hello,
I'm trying to understand or create an efficient procedure for using
ECDSA for authentication of a file. As far as I can see, one sends the
file, and sends the signature as a DER encoded pair or integers, in a
separate file. The receiver does need the public key point to verify
the si
Im lost on how to bring in Certs from Network Solutions.. Im trying
to get TLS running TRUSTED. My OS redhat..and one of the problems
TLS is working from inside to out but anyone replying command unknown
STARTTLS=client, relay=mail.sterlingsavings.com., version=TLSv1/SSLv3,
verify=FAIL, cipher=
Geoffrey Coram wrote:
I'm using the OpenSSL DLLs to go along with my e-mail client,
nPOP/nPOPuk, for Windows CE. For myself, I've
successfully compiled 0.9.8d under Windows CE 2.11 for ARM (as well as
MIPS and SH4); I can't find binaries for CE2.11 anywhere on the web.
Some other nPOPuk users
James Walker wrote:
I'm wondering why the sigbuf parameter of RSA_verify is declared as
unsigned char* rather than const unsigned char*. It's not going to
change the signature, is it?
it should not change the signature input and in openssl >= 0.9.8
it is const.
Nils
_
Moin Jürgen,
Jürgen Heiss wrote:
Hi everybody,
I try to verify a xml file which was signed with ecdsa-sha1.
I alredy read to SignatureValue from the xmlfile. which is.
724PlFGHTTL1cFlLFU6g6UetcPVBEAN6oNpogAUx3rgELFH86gA+NqvjVf316zek
are you _really_ sure that this is a ecdsa-with-somethin
