Hi,
I download openssl-0.9.8g from openssl.org website.
I want to build it using cygwin, so I run command config and command
make in cygwin.
libssl.a and libcrypt.a all be created.
But, this two lib can not work. Because I need armcc as compiler, not
gcc.
How can I do? I think that
Victor Duchovni:
When a user requests SSL protocol debug logging from Postfix, we use
essentially boilerplate code from SSL_CTX_set_info_callback(3):
And then they see so much crap that it freaks them out, and not
just the buffer-empty conditions.
It's like when people installed tcp wrapper.
Hi,
I test AES CBC mode with below test case(from RFC 3602 section 4). I meet some
questions which are strange for me.
(I use openssl-0.9.8g, under WidowsXP, VC6++),
1 EVP_EncryptFinal_ex() shall be called after calling EVP_EncryptUpdate(), or
not if the block is just 16 bytes long
2 when I
Victor Duchovni wrote:
When a user requests SSL protocol debug logging from Postfix, we use
essentially boilerplate code from SSL_CTX_set_info_callback(3):
... initialiation ...
if (where SSL_CB_LOOP)
{
Wietse Venema wrote:
Victor Duchovni:
When a user requests SSL protocol debug logging from Postfix, we use
essentially boilerplate code from SSL_CTX_set_info_callback(3):
And then they see so much crap that it freaks them out, and not
just the buffer-empty conditions.
It's like
Yes, indeed. When processing the moderation queue I accidantly hit the
approved button instead of delete.
Sorry,
Lutz
Vittorio Giovara wrote:
too much god and too much money in the same email...
not working...
http://www.lindqvist.com/en/esther-koffi-a-do-gooder-scammer
2007/12/12,
The decrypt program:
unsigned char *DecryptTest(unsigned char *in, int inl, unsigned
char *key, unsigned char *iv, int * outl)
{
int ret;
EVP_CIPHER_CTX ctx;
EVP_CIPHER_CTX_init(ctx);
ret = EVP_DecryptInit_ex(ctx, EVP_aes_128_cbc(), 0, key, iv);
if(!ret) abort();
Hello everyone,
I have a client that attempts to open a secured session with the server. After
calling SSL_connect(), on failure, the client would free the SSL object, and
read the response on normal tcp socket.
On the other hand, the server calls SSL_accept(), and on failure, would free
the
To begin with, when the client calls SSL_connect(), it is guaranteed that
the server is waiting / looping in SSL_accept(). So I believe there is no
chance that SSL_connect() will read any plaintext data.
In my scenario, the ERR_reason_error_string(ERR_get_error()) tells me that
there was a
I have a client that attempts to open a secured session with the server.
After calling SSL_connect(), on failure, the client would free the SSL
object,
and read the response on normal tcp socket.
On the other hand, the server calls SSL_accept(), and on failure, would
free
the SSL object,
First, if you pasted your original code into the email, then you have
several typos.
Second, two of the lines generate warnings on compilation about
incompatible pointer types - these are significant. The lines are:
num_byte = BN_dec2bn(dh_struct-p,str_p);
num_byte =
dh_struct = DH_new();
dh_struct-p = BN_new();
dh_struct-g = BN_new();
dh_struct-priv_key = BN_new();
dh_struct-pub_key = BN_new();
num_byte = BN_dec2bn(dh_struct-p,str_p); // Here it seems that not
execute anything about
Something is very wrong in your code. BN_new returns a 'BIGNUM *',
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 11:06:58AM +0100, Lutz Jaenicke wrote:
else if (ret 0) {
switch(SSL_get_error((SSL *)s, ret)) {
case SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ:
case SSL_ERROR_WANT_WRITE:
break;
default:
To begin with, when the client calls SSL_connect(), it is guaranteed that
the server is waiting / looping in SSL_accept(). So I believe there is no
chance that SSL_connect() will read any plaintext data.
Do you have any rational basis for this belief? Consider:
1) The client calls
14 matches
Mail list logo
