Yeah, I've read that signed and enveloped is not widely used, but it still
surprises me that PKCS7_Decrypt() wouldn't support it since the
PKCS7_SIGN_ENVELOPE structure has everything that a PKCS7_ENVELOPE has.
What about NID_pkcs7_encrypted? Is that also widely unused and unsupported?
My versio
Hi Sandeep and Adam Langley,
Thank you very much. But I did not find where the aliases LOW,MEDIUM and
HIGH are defined. I wanted to know where they are defined in OpenSSL?
Regards
Jaya
From: owner-openssl-...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-...@openssl.org]
On Behalf Of sandeep kira
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010, Phillip Hellewell wrote:
> Apparently PKCS7_decrypt() only works on enveloped data. How can I decrypt
> a PKCS7 of type signedAndEnveloped or encrypted?
>
Signed and enveloped isn't supported and hardly anyone implements it any more.
BTW you are best using the CMS functio
Apparently PKCS7_decrypt() only works on enveloped data. How can I decrypt
a PKCS7 of type signedAndEnveloped or encrypted?
Thanks,
Phillip
Why does E_EXE contain dhparam and E_OBJ contain dhparam.o, but E_SRC
does not contain dhparam.c?
(OpenSSL 1.0.0 fwiw)
__
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
User Support Mailing List
On 4/15/2010 12:42 PM, Adam Grossman wrote:
> hello,
>
> i had my code running on 0.9.8e without any issues. i upgraded to
> 0.9.8n, and now when my server initiates a renegotiation with the client
> (which is either IE or Firefox), SSL_renegotiation returns a 0. i
> understand from the CHANGELO
hello,
i had my code running on 0.9.8e without any issues. i upgraded to
0.9.8n, and now when my server initiates a renegotiation with the client
(which is either IE or Firefox), SSL_renegotiation returns a 0. i
understand from the CHANGELOG the it was not allowed until 0.9.8m, but
this line con
Run the following command to know which ciphers get selected.
# openssl ciphers 'ALL:!SSLv2:!EXPORT:!LOW:!MEDIUM:!DH'
AES256-SHA:AES128-SHA:DES-CBC3-SHA
-Sandeep
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Bhat, Jayalakshmi Manjunath <
jayalakshmi.b...@hp.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I wanted to know when
