Coincidently I was in the middle of writing a blog entry about the
verification where similar three functions are used.
Now it is published:
http://kriscience.blogspot.co.uk/2013/04/verifying-signatures-with-openssl.html
Cheers,
Kris
2013/4/8 Taraniteja Vishwanatha
> Thanks Kris. Will do.
>
>
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Bin Lu wrote:
> It fails with different CRL scope error (code 44).
>
> Yes the certificate contains the CRLDP extension and it contains the DP name
> which matches the one in IDP:
>
> Distribution Point Name:
> Full Name:
>URL=...
>Directory Address:
>
It fails with different CRL scope error (code 44).
Yes the certificate contains the CRLDP extension and it contains the DP name
which matches the one in IDP:
Distribution Point Name:
Full Name:
URL=...
Directory Address:
CN=...
O=...
It does not contain th
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013, Bin Lu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a CRL data which worked fine with 0.9.8d but now is failing with
> 1.0.1c. The IDP contains the following info:
>
> Distribution Point Name:
> Full Name:
> URL =http://...
> Directory Address:
> CN=...
> O=...
> Only
Hi Marek,
Yep, it worked! Thank you so, so much. You've helped me, well,
tremendously -- I've been working on connecting to a .NET web service
from PHP and the security exchange requires that algorithm at some
point. Not knowing what the algorithm was supposed to return created too
much uncertaint