Re: make install of openssl-1.0.0 exits error

2013-10-14 Thread Matt Caswell
On 14 October 2013 22:29, Joost Ringoot wrote: > Hello, > > I am trying to install openssl-1.0.0 on fedora 19. > I tried different versions: > openssl-1.0.0k.tar.gz > openssl-1.0.0f.tar.gz > and > openssl-1.0.0.tar.gz > > ./config and make appear ok > > but make install always ends like this: > >

make install of openssl-1.0.0 exits error

2013-10-14 Thread Joost Ringoot
Hello, I am trying to install openssl-1.0.0 on fedora 19. I tried different versions: openssl-1.0.0k.tar.gz openssl-1.0.0f.tar.gz and openssl-1.0.0.tar.gz ./config and make appear ok but make install always ends like this: installing man1/gendsa.1 installing man1/genpkey.1 genpkey.pod around li

Re: can non-blocking SSL_read() and SSL_write() be interleaved?

2013-10-14 Thread Darryl Miles
Dave Mitchell wrote: > Can calls to non-blocking SSL_read() and SSL_write() be interleaved? > > I'm doing select() / event driven IO, and using a BIO pair to handle the > underlying socket IO myself. Yes, but not from 2 threads working on the same "SSL *" at the same time. So your single threa

can non-blocking SSL_read() and SSL_write() be interleaved?

2013-10-14 Thread Dave Mitchell
Can calls to non-blocking SSL_read() and SSL_write() be interleaved? I'm doing select() / event driven IO, and using a BIO pair to handle the underlying socket IO myself. A typical sequence might be: SSL_read(ssl, read_buf, read_size); /* returns e.g. SSL_ERROR_WANT_READ */ select();

Re: [openssl-users] Re: connection problem with the version 1.0.1e

2013-10-14 Thread Erwann Abalea
Le 11/10/2013 19:57, nehakochar a écrit : Erwann ABALEA wrote The server and client are both compliant. With the first command, you tell the client to use TLS1.0 only. No more, no less. The server is ok with it, and both negociate TLS1.0. With the second command, you tell the client to use TLS1