Hi
I want to install OpenSSL 1.0.1e on my CentOS 6.4. I downloaded the souce
and built it by running
./config
make
make install
The make install is not installing libcrypto.so, libssl.so and openssl
binary into /usr/bin and /usr/lib64. I need it to be installed there.
Any advice?
Thanks
Rahul
Configuring with no-apps does not work either (even though it states
its skipping the directory):
$ ./config shared -no-ssl2 -no-ssl3 -no-comp -no-hw -no-engine
-no-apps --openssldir=/usr/local/ssl/android-14/
Operating system: i686-whatever-android
Configuring for android-x86
no-apps
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:13:55AM +0530, Yash Dosi wrote:
> I am creating an android app which can perform basic email security
> operations like encryption, decryption, signing and verification. So far I
> am able to perform all 4 operations successfully. But one thing I still
> haven't figured
I'm working with OpenSSL 1.0.1h. I'm configuring for android-x86.
setenv-android.sh worked fine, and exported the following:
export MACHINE=i686
export RELEASE=2.6.37
export SYSTEM=android
export ARCH=x86
export CROSS_COMPILE="i686-linux-android-"
export
ANDROID_DEV="$AN
Hi All,
I am creating an android app which can perform basic email security
operations like encryption, decryption, signing and verification. So far I
am able to perform all 4 operations successfully. But one thing I still
haven't figured out is how to specify Signing Algorithm at runtime.
I mean
On 10 June 2014 15:24, Anant Rao wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Objective in one-line:
> =
> Verify a signature, given an ECDSA public key in X509 format.
>
>
> Details:
> ==
> I read an X509 cert stored on disk. The following are some of its contents:
>
> Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKe
remember doing something along the lines of :
ecPublicKey = X509_get_pubkey(readCertificate);
EC_KEY *ecKey;
ecKey = EVP_PKEY_get1_EC_KEY(ecPublicKey);
EC_KEY_set_asn1_flag(ecKey, );
ecGroup = EC_GROUP_new_by_curve_name();
EC_KEY_set_group(ecKey, ecGroup);
int status = ECDSA_verify(ecPublicKey->
Thanks! Got a build with 0610's snapshot.
However rebuilt openssl0.9.8za with no-ec (not rebuild fips libs), still see
the same error.
-DOPENSSL_NO_EC -DOPENSSL_NO_ECDSA -DOPENSSL_NO_ECDH
-Original Message-
From: owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org [mailto:owner-openssl-us...@openssl.org]
On
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014, Zhang, Ping (Unisphere) wrote:
> In process upgrade openssl to 0.9.8za. When building with fips module 1.2.4
> lib, failed with link error. The same process and fips 1.2.4 lib works with
> 0.9.8y.
>
> Compared the code difference with 0.9.8za and 0.9.8y, noticed
> BN_cons
In process upgrade openssl to 0.9.8za. When building with fips module 1.2.4
lib, failed with link error. The same process and fips 1.2.4 lib works with
0.9.8y.
Compared the code difference with 0.9.8za and 0.9.8y, noticed
BN_consttime_swap() is used in 0.9.8za crypto/ec/ec2_mult.c.
perl Config
Hi,
Objective in one-line:
=
Verify a signature, given an ECDSA public key in X509 format.
Details:
==
I read an X509 cert stored on disk. The following are some of its contents:
Public Key Algorithm: id-ecPublicKey
Public-Key: (256 bit)
...
ASN1 OID: prime2
Hi,
When configure'd with "no-engine" and "no-hw" options, build of OpenSSL
1.0.1h on Windows 7 failed.
Although it might not be the best solution, the attached patch solved
this (for static linking) by adding or moving up some related
preprocessor directives.
But still leaves a problem when
Thanks Raheeda,
So you say this is a bug in PostgeSQL and from version 9.3 and above works
fine? Do you any links which speaks on this?
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Rahila Syed wrote:
> Hello,
>
> SSL renegotiation is error prone in PostgreSQL version 9.3 and below.
> You can either upgra
Bonjour,
No need to include openssl-dev here.
If A1 and A2 have the same subject, then they are 2 certificates for the
same CA. Therefore, your gateway is right in testing A1 first.
However, if your software is correctly configured, it should also test
A2. That's what OpenSSL does when given a
Hi,
I have a query for Ca-Cert list.
If at gateway we have configured two CA-certs A1 and A2 both having same
subject and content except time-stamp of generation.
If peer sends Cert matching to A2, gateway tries to validate it with
A1(subject being same and configured first in list) and validatio
16 matches
Mail list logo