On Wed, Oct 01, 2014, Pedro Lamaro wrote:
> Hello, fellows.
>
> I am implementing a new streamer for CMS_SignedData with CMS_sign.
> Because I need to adapt a certain input and output interface, I chose
> to use BIO pairs with BIO_new_CMS. I read from my original input
> stream, write into the CM
Hi,
It is unsafe to access SSL context from 2 different threads. When you
call SSL_write function, the SSL context object state is changed.
Probably you can end up in case that data is not delivered to the peer.
Kris
On Tue, 2014-09-30 at 13:46 +, S P, Swaroop (NSN - IN/Bangalore)
wrote:
> H
Hello, fellows.
I am implementing a new streamer for CMS_SignedData with CMS_sign.
Because I need to adapt a certain input and output interface, I chose
to use BIO pairs with BIO_new_CMS. I read from my original input
stream, write into the CMS filter, read from the pair and write to the
original
[Top-posted because Outlook can't deal correctly with HTML email.]
> Is this safe?
No. There's a lot of state in the SSL object (which is not an "SSL context", in
OpenSSL terminology; the SSL_CTX object is an "SSL context"), and the SSL/TLS
methods' write functions do not serialize access to it
Hi All,
Having two issues with OpenSSL with FIPS for ANDROID.
Issue 1:
I am compiling OpenSSL-1.0.1i with OpenSSLFips-2.0.7 under MIPS EL
architecture for FIPS support for ANDROID.
And when I crossed compile for using the 'fips shared' config option, I
still get a static libs (libcrypto.a & libssl
Hi,
We have a use-case where multiple threads are required to use the same SSL
context [created using SSL_new()] and do a ssl_write().
So, there might be a scenario where two threads (or more) can be doing a
ssl_write() on the same SSL context at exactly the same time.
Is this safe?
Is the data