[openssl-users] SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:required cipher missing

For the past week I've been noticing many entries like this in our nginx error logs: SSL_do_handshake() failed (SSL: error:1408A0D7:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:required cipher missing) while SSL handshaking What does the error "required cipher missing" mean exactly? Some of our users repor

[openssl-users] EVP_DigestSignInit failed, error 0x0000000d?

What does it mean when EVP_DigestSignInit fails with an error code of 0x000d? On failure, the code is being fetched with ERR_get_error(). -- $ /usr/local/ssl/bin/openssl errstr 0x0d error:000D:lib(0):func(0):ASN1 lib -- I see its declared in evp.h, but I don't see a bod

Re: [openssl-users] Generating large DH parameters

On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 08:23:13AM -0600, jack seth wrote: > Thanks for the explanation. So I guess I just got lucky with > the first one. :) Do you have any kind of estimate of how long > it will take to generate? The density of strong primes is conjectured to be ~1.3*n/(ln(n))^2. For 16k bi

Re: [openssl-users] Assembler Optimizations in 'crypto' on Windows

Just my opinion ... but ... While nasm is the only supported assembler, I have been able to get masm to work but I often have to tweak the perl code a bit. Every few months I have been testing and reporting my findings to the openssl-dev group about my results. When possible folks seem to be abl

[openssl-users] Platinum Sponsorship by Oracle

I am pleased to announce Oracle Corporation (http://www.oracle.com) as the third Platinum Sponsor of the OpenSSL project, and the first such sponsor from the United States. For several years, Oracle has provided financial support in the form of commercial funding of platform validations for the Op

[openssl-users] Forthcoming OpenSSL releases and reformat

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The OpenSSL Project are pleased to make the following announcements: - - There will be new releases made available on Thursday 15th January for versions 1.0.1, 1.0.0 and 0.9.8. These will be bug fix only releases to address build problems with the cur

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL coding style published

> There's a typo "Somtimes" in chapter 16. Thanks. Will push a fix sometime soon ___ openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users

Re: [openssl-users] Generating large DH parameters

Thanks for the explanation. So I guess I just got lucky with the first one. :) Do you have any kind of estimate of how long it will take to generate? > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 13:27:55 + > From: m...@openssl.org > To: openssl-users@openssl.org > Subject: Re: [openssl-users] Generating large

[openssl-users] Assembler Optimizations in 'crypto' on Windows

Dear OpenSSL User, I am working on porting 0.9.8h based 'OpenSSL customization' to 1.0.1. Earlier this code was using 'cpp' as input parameter to the Perl scripts. 1. What option shall I use now for Windows? As per documentation, nasm will be the only supported assembler. But currently both mas

Re: [openssl-users] Generating large DH parameters

On 14/01/15 12:35, jack seth wrote: > I am trying to generate a 16384 bit DH file for testing purposes. Is > it necessary to have a '.rnd' in existence before trying to generate > this file? I generated one which took 4 days to do but the computer had > a .rnd file. I am currently trying to g

[openssl-users] Generating large DH parameters

I am trying to generate a 16384 bit DH file for testing purposes. Is it necessary to have a '.rnd' in existence before trying to generate this file? I generated one which took 4 days to do but the computer had a .rnd file. I am currently trying to generate another on a system WITHOUT the .rn

Re: [openssl-users] OpenSSL coding style published

+1 There's a typo "Somtimes" in chapter 16. Eng. Gabriele Pongelli AVVERTENZE AI SENSI DEL D.LGS. 196/2003 Le informazioni contenute in questo messaggio di posta elettronica e negli eventuali files allegati, sono da considerarsi strettamente riservati. Il loro utilizzo è consentito esclusivame