Re: [openssl-users] glibc detected *** xxx: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x097b8750

2016-05-10 Thread Vikas TM
Hi Matt, It looks like handling crypto lock mechanism issue. I defined NO SRP. Now I am getting segmentation fault in CRYPTO_add_lock() function referencing NULL pointer. Please find GDB output below, (gdb) run ftp://x.x.x.x:sample.txt Starting program: /App/vikftp ftp://x.x.x.x:sample.txt Miss

Re: [openssl-users] is 1.0.2g meant to be buildable ? missing rc4_md5_enc implementation !

2016-05-10 Thread Jason Vas Dias
Thanks Jakob - But running the rc4-x86_64.pl script, even if by a Makefile, does not define the function either : $ ./rc4-x86_64.pl > ../rc4-md5-x86_64.s $ cd .. $ as -o rc4-md5-x86_64.o rc4-md5-x86_64.s $ nm rc4-md5-x86_64.o U OPENSSL_ia32cap_P T RC4 000

Re: [openssl-users] good riddance to PayPal

2016-05-10 Thread Steve Marquess
On 05/05/2016 04:41 PM, Steve Marquess wrote: > We've had a PayPal account for years, as the most convenient way for > individuals to send small donations. However, as the person who has > managed that account I can attest that PayPal has always been rather > annoying to deal with, and I've finally

[openssl-users] Attack of the FIPS 140-2 Clones

2016-05-10 Thread Steve Marquess
If you neither know nor care what FIPS 140-2 is, count yourself lucky and move on (even if you're a Star Wars fan; this isn't nearly as entertaining). The "Alternative Scenario 1A/1B" aka "clone" aka "rebrand" validations have been an endless source of confusion, even for the accredited test labs