Thanks Roelof, This is really helpful.
BR, Neetish On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 4:45 PM, Roelof Du Toit <roelof_dut...@symantec.com> wrote: > Hi Neetish, > > > > I would recommend considering the following in your research: > > - The impact of Nagle. See https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues/4237 > > - The impact of the KeyShare calculation on TLS 1.3 session resumption > (assuming most deployments will use psk_dhe_ke) > > - The impact of post-handshake handshake messages. > > > > Regards > > Roelof > > > > *From: *openssl-users <openssl-users-boun...@openssl.org> on behalf of > Neetish Pathak <npath...@ncsu.edu> > *Reply-To: *"openssl-users@openssl.org" <openssl-users@openssl.org> > *Date: *Thursday, September 14, 2017 at 4:20 PM > *To: *"openssl-users@openssl.org" <openssl-users@openssl.org> > *Subject: *[EXT] [openssl-users] TLS 1.3 performance > > > > Hi, > > > > I worked on TLS 1.3 performance bench-marking. After my tests, I found > that TLS 1.3 based resumption is not giving us the connection latency > benefits when tested in a LAN environment. It is slower than TLS 1.2. When > tested on WAN, definitely, TLS 1.3 fares better than TLS 1.2. > > I want your suggestion on whether can I work on the following problem for > my research project: *"Investigating why TLS 1.3 > resumption/0-RTT/full-handshake doesn't provide the desired connection > latency benefits in LAN and the ways to make it faster?"* > > I want suggestions/references on the right research problem. Any ideas > will be appreciated. > > > > Thanks in advance > > > > Thanks > > Best Regards, > > Neetish > > -- > openssl-users mailing list > To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users > >
-- openssl-users mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users