Hi Richard, all,
I tried to do the forward declaration also for the TEST_SIGNATURE
together with the TEST one, but that did not really work :( It is still
complaining about the use of 'sizeof' on an incomplete type. In
particular, the two errors are:
src/ocspv2/****: error: use of undeclared identifier 'TEST_it'
ASN1_EXP_SEQUENCE_OF_OPT(TEST_TBS, otherTests, TEST, 5),
^
and
src/ocspv2/****: error: invalid application of 'sizeof' to an
incomplete type 'const ASN1_TEMPLATE []'
} ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST_TBS)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I guess I need to checkout the macros a bit more.. :D
Question: does anybody know if there is any other structure already
implemented in OpenSSL that resembles the one I am trying to do here? I
tried to look for something similar, but no success.. :D
If there is no easy answer, I guess I will have to either change the
envisioned approach (maybe introducing an intermediate data structure of
some kind..?) or use the ASN1_ANY approach.
Cheers,
Max
On 12/2/17 4:54 AM, Richard Levitte wrote:
In message <d1eeba62-f25f-c984-dc77-94a150cf7...@openca.org> on Fri, 1 Dec 2017 20:22:09 -0700,
"Dr. Pala" <madw...@openca.org> said:
madwolf> Hi Richard,
madwolf>
madwolf> thanks :D That worked. I have a new challenge for you now. Here's what
madwolf> I am trying to do:
madwolf>
madwolf> ASN1_SEQUENCE(TEST);
madwolf> ASN1_SEQUENCE(TBS_TEST) = {
madwolf> ASN1_SIMPLE(TBS_TEST, version, ASN1_INTEGER),
madwolf> ASN1_EXP_SEQUENCE_OF_OPT(TBS_TEST, otherTests, TEST, 0)
madwolf> } ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST)
madwolf>
madwolf> IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(TBS_TEST) [**]
madwolf>
madwolf> ASN1_SEQUENCE(TEST) = {
madwolf> ASN1_SIMPLE(TEST, tbsTest, ASN1_INTEGER),
madwolf> ASN1_EXP_OPT(TEST, optionalSignature, TEST_SIGNATURE, 0)
madwolf> } ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST)
madwolf>
madwolf> IMPLEMENT_ASN1_FUNCTIONS(TEST) [**]
madwolf>
madwolf> In this case, the difference is that TBS_TEST has, inside the
madwolf> otherTests that are of type TEST. The TEST is built out of a tbsTest
madwolf> and an optionalSignature - but it is defined after TBS_TEST.
madwolf>
madwolf> What to do in this case ?
It seems to me that you need to do some kind of forward declaration of
TEST_SIGNATURE as well, before the construction of TEST. (also, to be
picky, you need to make sure that ASN1_SEQUENCE(TBS_TEST) is ended
with ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TBS_TEST), not ASN1_SEQUENCE_END(TEST))
Cheers,
Richard
--
openssl-users mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-users
